Making an Ancient Greek Lyre for my Classics Independent Study

Sabrina Farrell sitting on the quad with the ancient Greek lyre that she built.Echoes of the ancient Greek chelys lyre kept appearing in my courses: Greek pottery depicting a lyrist’s playing technique or ancient literature describing its acoustics. These sources inform our knowledge of the lyre, and can in turn be brought to life by attempting to replicate the lyre itself. Endeavoring to experience the music of the ancient world this winter study, I worked with the Williams College Makerspace, Classics department, and many other incredible sources of help to create a playable, sonorous chelys lyre replica.

The First Vegan Lyre… Ever??

My completed ancient Greek lyre sounds amazing!

My completed ancient Greek lyre sounds amazing!

The ancient Greek chelys lyre, named so for the χέλυς (tortoise) shell used for the soundbox resonator, is said in the Homeric Hymn to Hermes to have first been made by Hermes as an apology gift to Apollo for kidnapping his cows. This was one of the ancient Greek texts I read with my project’s advisor, Visiting Assistant Professor of Classics Marissa Henry, who was an incredible guide throughout the entire project. Reading about the unfortunate tortoise who was first turned into a lyre, I was very glad about my choice to make a fully vegan lyre—no tortoises or cows harmed! In fact, in all my research I did not come across another chelys lyre—ancient or modern—that uses zero animal products. This gave a lot of room for creativity, riffing off of the trial and error of other lyre-makers.

Tortoiseshell Soundbox

Printing a tortoiseshell replica using the Prusa XL 3D printer to make a fully vegan lyre—no tortoises or cows harmed!

Printing a tortoiseshell replica using the Prusa XL 3D printer to make a fully vegan lyre—no tortoises or cows harmed!

The biggest headscratcher was the tortoiseshell soundbox, which we considered making out of a hollowed-out gourd or a wooden salad bowl. While both are great alternatives, a gourd is quite fragile and unpredictable as a natural object, and a salad bowl felt too easy. Luckily, the Makerspace gives students access to 3D-printers for just this sort of moment. When I asked David Keiser-Clark, the Manager of the Makerspace and FabLab, and a huge contributor to the lyre, if it was possible to 3D print the tortoiseshell, I expected it to be too complicated or not viable—perhaps the material wouldn’t be resonant enough, or a tortoiseshell too complex to print. It turned out to be a fantastic way to replicate the tortoiseshell, using an online 3D scan of a tortoiseshell that I downloaded (as an STL file) and then modified using Fusion 360 and Blender (modeling software) to create strategic holes for the arms of the lyre to enter and the tailpiece to jut out.

Help from an Expert Luthier 

Expert luthier Steve Sauvé at Sauvé Guitars in North Adams, Massachusetts.

Expert luthier Steve Sauvé at Sauvé Guitars in North Adams, Massachusetts.

Next, we had to think about how to build the drumhead of the lyre, usually made by stretching animal skin over the face of the shell. In my research, mylar came up as an alternative, but mylar is not flexible and mouldable in the same way that animal skin is. I learned this and many other luthier insights from Steve Sauvé at Sauvé Guitars in North Adams, Massachusetts. He presented me with an alternative: a mylar banjo head! We decided to fashion it to the lyre by 3D modeling and printing a bespoke insert ring that would snugly support the banjo head, forming the face of the lyre. In the original hymn, the strings of the lyre were made from the guts of Apollo’s cow, and gut strings were primarily used for traditional instruments. For our purposes, nylon proved a great alternative, with ukulele strings being the best fit, which I found with the help of Collar City Guitars in Troy, NY.

And Alumni Woodworkers

Using a bandsaw to cut one of the lyre's arms.

Using a bandsaw to cut one of the lyre’s arms.

Shaping the wood for the lyre was tough to figure out and presented challenges. I had never used power or carving tools, and I was starting from two gorgeous blocks of cherry wood bought from Sauvé Guitars. I learned how to shape and replicate the traditional snaking arms and intricate tuning bulges (these hold the strings and allow them to be adjusted) from the advice of the teachers (all alumni: Seth Rolland, Chris Mullen, and Richard Song) of the winter study course “Introduction to Woodwork: Art, Design and Craft” (WSP 16). They were incredibly helpful, showing me how to safely use a bandsaw to create rough, blocky cuts for the arms and bridge. I called this the “Minecraft version” of the lyre. 

Learning to Use a Wood Lathe

Jason Mativi, Senior Science Center Shop Engineer, and David Keiser-Clark were both huge resources who together helped me learn how to safely use the wood lathe and disc sander.

Jason Mativi, Senior Science Center Shop Engineer, and David Keiser-Clark were both huge resources who together helped me learn how to safely use the wood lathe and disc sander.

The intimidating wood lathe in the Hopper Science Shop was the key to rounding the rectangular crossbars and tuning bulges (pegs) that maintain the tension of the lyre’s seven strings. Jason Mativi, Senior Science Center Shop Engineer, and David Keiser-Clark were both huge resources who together helped me learn how to safely use these tools. David stayed with (always alert) throughout the entire process, offering me a kind balance of support, guidance, and independence.

The lathe was the tool I had to be the most cautious while operating: it spins the wood very rapidly (~2000 RPM) and I used lathe chisels to slowly transform the rough cut block of cherry into a gorgeous cylindrical object with uniform shape and width. I used the lathe to create two crossbars and 14 wood tuning bulges, then used a stationary disc sander to further shape these pieces and add intentional charring to increase visual contrast. I learned how to use a universal metal bender to shape a stock 3/16” straight metal steel rod into a functional “buckle” that I later mounted in the lyre’s tail (below the bridge) and used to tie off the strings.

A close up of using the wood lathe and lathe chisels to turn the 14 tuning bulges.

A close up of using the wood lathe and lathe chisels to turn the 14 tuning bulges.

14 tuning bulges, turned on the lathe, and some have been sanded on the disc sander, while others await that final treatment.

14 tuning bulges, turned on the lathe, and some have been sanded on the disc sander, while others await that final treatment.

Spokeshaves and Flowing Organic Curves

Lee Valley spokeshaves set: flat, round, and concave.

Lee Valley spokeshaves set: flat, round, and concave.

David and I returned to the Makerspace, and he introduced me to using high-quality spokeshaves (like two-handed wood planes) to shape the arms: they pull the wood off in super-thin and satisfying ribbons that result in a smoothly curved and organic shape. 

However, when I began the dry assembly of these nearly completed pieces, it became apparent that the length of the lyre’s arms were too short to allow for tying off the strings below the 8” banjo head. The lyre required a longer tail. Ack! I brought this problem to David and he suggested using a leftover scrap (from our original cherry planks) to create a contoured half-lap woodworking joint to seamlessly extend the arms. I was running out of time, and he volunteered to do this complicated hand work. He returned it to me the next day and I was able to resume the dry assembly. 

Wood joinery: extending the arms by creating a halflap joint, fastened with removable bolts to enable future adjustments.

Wood joinery: extending the arms by creating a halflap joint, fastened with removable bolts to enable future adjustments.

3D Modeling: The Magic of Creating Custom Shapes and Bespoke Parts

The next challenge was to figure out how to securely connect the 3D printed tortoiseshell with the two cherry arms. A shoutout to Anderson Keiser-Clark, 13, for contributing his Blender expertise that modified the digital tortoiseshell to include snug holes for the arms and tail to pass through. He also created a custom lid that bolts to the base (to allow future maintenance) and included a ring on which to securely mount the banjo head. 

3D modeling work with Blender software created exactly matching top and bottom parts that securely hold the arms in place.

3D modeling work with Blender software created exactly matching top and bottom parts that securely hold the arms in place.

Shaping the Bridge and Finally: Assembly!

Sabrina using a coping saw to shape the bridge for the lyre.

Sabrina using a coping saw to shape the bridge for the lyre.

I used a coping saw to shape the bridge and create the desired curves. I stained only the 14 tuning bulges, and then used vegan Walrus oil on all of the wood parts to bring out the beautiful highlights of the grain. And finally, I successfully assembled the lyre and tuned the strings. Amazing!

Learning to Play the Lyre

Sabrina Farrell learning to play the lyre with UVM Professor Rachel Fikes.

Sabrina Farrell learning to play the lyre with UVM Professor Rachel Fikes.

In order to learn the physical technique of playing the lyre, Dr. Henry and I made our way to Vermont to meet with members of the Call of Kinnaru, a group from the University of Vermont who play new ancient music featuring kitharists among other instrumentalists. Professor John Franklin and Rachel Fikes were kind enough to let me play their lyres and introduce me to the incredible process of developing music from what we know of ancient practices. It was especially enriching to physically hold a lyre, so that I could feel exactly what I was working towards.

Inspiration from the New York City Ballet

The symbol of the New York City Ballet Company is the lyre.

The symbol of the New York City Ballet Company is the lyre.

Even outside making the lyre, I got to experience the joy of this instrument in many ways. Artist-in-Residence in Dance Janine Parker, whom I have been learning ballet with since I first came to Williams, took three of us to the New York City Ballet, since the symbol of the New York City Ballet Company is the lyre. Not only that, but it featured a dance called Antique Epigraphs choreographed by Jerome Robbins to music by Claude Debussy, which was an incredible piece inspired by Greek antiquity. This was such an incredible ballet to see and a singularly amazing experience in seeing the ancient embodied.

Teaching Students from the Williamstown Elementary School’s Robotics Team

Members of the Williamstown Elementary School’s Robotics Team.

Members of the Williamstown Elementary School’s Robotics Team.

This independent study also offered me the opportunity to make mini cardboard lyres with 6th grade students from Williamstown Elementary School’s Robotics program, led by Associate Professor of Classics Sarah Olsen. The theme this year for the robotics competition was archaeology! I was so happy to share with them my journey building a lyre and the exercise making cardboard lyres. They are such amazing students and are lucky to work alongside Professor Olsen who first introduced me to ancient Greek language and classics as a whole.

Thank You!

Thank you to everyone already mentioned and all the many others who helped me along the way! This was truly a group effort to build and I’m so thankful for the incredible support in making music.

Starting point was a slab of cherry wood (arms drawn in pencil). Final product is my own custom ancient Greek lyre that is an absolute joy to play!

Starting point was a slab of cherry wood (arms drawn in pencil). Final product is my own custom ancient Greek lyre that is an absolute joy to play!

See Related Articles

The Williams Record: The Artist Otherwise Known As: Sabrina Ferrell ’28 (May 7, 2026, by Edward Maxam)

Classics department hosts evening of ‘new ancient Greek music’ (April 23, 2025, by Rosario Carranza and Tahlia Gerger)

 

Senior Thesis: Hamletmachine #2026

Coco Zhang '26 acts in Jane Su's senior theater thesis Hamletmachine #2026

Coco Zhang ’26 acts in Jane Su’s senior theater thesis Hamletmachine #2026

My senior theater thesis Hamletmachine #2026 requires precision in props—a collection of objects tied to the ensemble performers’ family and political histories. The adaptation thus lives at the intersection of the personal and the historical.

The Makerspace was instrumental in this process. My team and I were looking for a replica of Lenin’s head in bronze, but the performer who had a personal association with it couldn’t bring one from home, and we couldn’t find one online. David from the Makerspace helped with modeling, adjustments, 3D printing, and we discussed types of paint that would adhere to the resultant PLA printed head. Ultimately, I used a metallic bronze acrylic paint as a post-processing medium to transform the white plastic head into a vivid and almost iridescent sculptural replica of Lenin’s head for the show.

Production

Diliara Sadykova ’26, Saumya Shinde ’26, Coco Zhang ’26 (left to right) act in Jane Su's senior theater thesis: Hamletmachine #2026.

Diliara Sadykova ’26, Saumya Shinde ’26, Coco Zhang ’26 (left to right) act in Jane Su’s senior theater thesis: Hamletmachine #2026.

Various props, including the 3D-printed Lenin sculptural head, in Jane Su's senior theater thesis Hamletmachine #2026

Various props, including the 3D-printed Lenin sculptural head, in Jane Su’s senior theater thesis Hamletmachine #2026

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Despite being a STEM-oriented space, the Makerspace proved to be a powerful platform for supporting art-making on campus.

The Williams Record: A Beautiful Opacity: Senior thesis Hamletmachine #2026 takes the stage (March 18, 2026 – by Cate Stetson ’29)

Post-Performance Discussion

Post-performance discussion between the producer and cast of Hamletmachine #2026 and the '62 Center audience

Post-performance discussion between the producer and cast of Hamletmachine #2026 and the ’62 Center audience

 

Senior Year Experience: Igniting Creativity and Innovation at Williams College

As senior year at Williams College nears its conclusion, students are offered a unique and exciting opportunity to leave their legacy through the Senior Year Experience (SYE). The Makerspace and Fabrication Lab are collaborating with the SYE to offer seniors opportunities to channel their creativity and bring their most ambitious ideas to life.

makerspaceWhether it’s working on a meaningful piece of art, designing an innovative product, or building something entirely out of the box, the SYE provides access to cutting-edge tools like 3D printers, laser cutters, woodworking equipment, and more. But it’s not just about the tools students are guided by experienced staff who are passionate about turning ideas into tangible results.

The SYE encourages seniors to think big, experiment boldly, and create something that truly reflects their passions and journey at Williams. It’s not just a project; it’s a chance to showcase innovation, dedication, and individuality as they prepare to step into the next chapter of their lives.

What is the Senior Year Experience?

The Senior Year Experience (SYE) is an exciting opportunity for seniors to dive into extracurricular projects that reflect their passions and aspirations. Whether you’re envisioning a sustainable 3D printing solution, designing intricate textiles, or building innovative prototypes with Raspberry Pi, the SYE provides the perfect platform to bring your ideas to life. The possibilities are as vast as your imagination.

What sets this program apart is its access to an incredible network of resources, including the Makerspace, Fabrication Lab, and perhaps even parts of the interdisciplinary MakersWeb. These spaces foster collaboration and creativity, connecting students with over 20 unique workspaces across campus. It’s not just about the tools; it’s about the vibrant community of creators who inspire and support one another.

Students have the freedom to explore a wide range of mediums, such as:

  • 3D Printing and Scanning: Create intricate designs or explore sustainable printing solutions.
  • Laser Cutting and Engraving: Add precision and detail to your projects with state-of-the-art technology.
  • Photogrammetry and Mold Making: Transform objects into digital models or design complex molds.
  • Fiber Arts: Try your hand at quilting, sewing, crocheting, or even experimenting with mixed textiles.
  • Microprocessor Prototyping: Build interactive devices using Arduino or Raspberry Pi.
  • Woodworking and Cricut Cutting: Craft furniture, decor, or intricate designs with these versatile tools.

The Application Process: Turning Ideas into Reality

Getting started with the Senior Year Experience (SYE) is as straightforward as sharing your vision. The process is designed to be simple yet impactful, ensuring that every participant has the opportunity to fully explore their creativity. Here’s how it works:

1. Submit Your Idea

The journey begins with an email. Reach out to David Keiser-Clark, the Makerspace Program Manager, to pitch your project idea. Don’t worry if it’s still in the brainstorming stage. This is your chance to outline your vision, explain your goals, and share what excites you about your project. Whether it’s a sustainable solution, an artistic masterpiece, or a tech-driven innovation, the SYE is all about giving life to bold and unique ideas.

2. Collaborate and Create

Once your project is accepted, you’ll dive into the creative process with the support of campus experts and access to state-of-the-art tools. From 3D printers and laser cutters to fiber arts tools and microprocessor kits, the Makerspace and Fabrication Lab have everything you need to bring your concept to life. You’ll also have the chance to collaborate with knowledgeable staff and fellow students, making the experience as enriching as it is productive.

3. Showcase Your Work

At the end of the semester, your project will take center stage. Whether it’s displayed at an exhibition or shared with the broader campus community, your work will inspire future innovation and creativity. Completing an SYE project isn’t just about the final product, it’s about the process, the lessons learned, and the mark you leave on the Williams community. You also will be offered an opportunity to amplify your work by writing a guest Makerspace blog post.

What You Need to Know

  • The SYE accepts up to five projects per semester on a first-come, first-served basis. This ensures each participant receives a personalized, focused experience.
  • Selected projects are matched with the expertise available on campus, ensuring the right guidance and resources are at your fingertips.

The application process is intentionally simple, giving you more time to focus on what really matters, creating something meaningful, innovative, and entirely your own. So, if you have an idea that’s been buzzing in your head, now’s the time to turn it into reality. The SYE is your platform; all you need to do is take the first step.

A Network of Campus Partners

The SYE thrives on collaboration, integrating support from campus partners like Alumni Engagement, Career S

ervices, the Zilkha Center, and more than a dozen others. These partnerships enhance the program’s impact, offering students a robust platform to refine their skills and showcase their achievements.

Leadership Behind the SYE

The Senior Year Experience (SYE) at Williams College was initiated under the leadership of Associate Dean Ray Grant, who serves as the Associate Dean for Senior Year Students and Director of Students in Transition. Dean Grant has been instrumental in shap

ing the SYE to provide seniors with meaningful opportunities to celebrate their achievements, explore new interests, and prepare for life after graduation. His dedication to student development ensures that the SYE remains a cornerstone of the senior experience at Williams. 

If the SYE had a superhero, it would be Dean Ray Grant: the guy who turned the “senior slump” into a launchpad for creativity and adventure. As the Associate Dean for Senior Year Students, he’s made sure the SYE isn’t just another check-the-box requirement but a once-in-a-lifetime chance to make your mark at Williams. His goal? Help every senior leave with stories, skills, and something awesome to show for their time here.

Why SYE Matters

Beyond creating something tangible, the SYE is about professional growth and personal fulfillment. Imagine presenting a digital portfolio of your project to potential employers, highlighting skills in research, design, and execution. Platforms like Wakelet and Bulb, recommended by the SYE team, provide seamless ways to compile and share these experiences.

Inspiring Creations

The Makerspace has already facilitated awe-inspiring projects, such as:

  • High resolution 3D photogrammetry scans of million year old Bovid teeth from an archeological site in the Siwalik Hills, India
  • Extracurricular 3D-printed and painted board games like Catan
  • Sustainably harvested Hopkins Forest logs to laser-engraved garden signs for the Zilkha Center
  • Museum quality exhibition reproductions such as this Mayan Tenon (“monster” head)
  • Lincoln life masks brought to life with 3D modeling

These creations demonstrate the blend of creativity and innovation that the SYE nurtures.

Happy applying!

Making Time: Reimagining Ancient Greek Paradigms through 3D Printing

ChatGPT-generated image of Chronos and symbols of linearized time such as the hourglass and clock gears

ChatGPT-generated image of Chronos and symbols of linearized time such as the hourglass and clock gears

For the final project of my Winter Study course, COGS 10: Minds, Machines, and the Making of Meaning taught by Dr. Charles Kaufmann, I was asked to “integrate the scientific, philosophical, computational, and experiential strands of the course into a single, coherent act of meaning-making.” Having recently read an article about bioprinting—a form of 3D printing that uses organic matter, often including living cells, to create new tissue—I was inspired to cap off my learning experience with some form of material creation.

A simple Google search of “Williams 3D printing” led me to the Makerspace, the on-campus hub for all things related to innovation, creativity, and hands-on learning. I was particularly moved by the idea of Critical Making which combines critical thinking and material design into a unified mode of expression and inquiry. I knew this was how I wanted to approach my culminating reflection.

Minds and Machines Behind the Project

The crux of my project was to explore how minds and machines interface to create meaning, specifically through the lens of different ancient Greek models of time as represented by three deities: Chronos, Aion, and Kairos. That process of intellectual discovery was enabled by the following:

Minds and Machines Behind the Project

Minds and Machines Behind the Project

Getting to Know the Space

At the outset of the project, I lacked confidence, having no prior training in 3D modeling of any kind. When I reached out to Mr. David to talk through the specifics of my project idea and gauge the possibility of its completion in a compressed timeframe, I feared that my inexperience would make my goals unfeasible. On my first tour of the Makerspace a few days later, however, my trepidation was quickly melted away by Mr. David’s nonpareil enthusiasm and encouragement. I was pleasantly surprised to hear that my idea was realistically achievable, that he would help through the entire process, and that I could learn first-hand to perform some of the techniques involved.

The Process: From Red Spaghetti to Hellenic Models

Left to Right: (1) ChatGPT-generated image of Chronos and symbols of linearized time such as the hourglass and clock gears; (2) 3D model of Chronos produced by MeshyAI and Hitem3D software, based on the original image; (3) Editing the 3D model in PrusaSlicer to achieve proper scale and supports

Left to Right:
(1) ChatGPT-generated image of Chronos and symbols of linearized time such as the hourglass and clock gears
(2) 3D model of Chronos produced by MeshyAI and Hitem3D software, based on the original image
(3) Editing the 3D model in PrusaSlicer to achieve proper scale and supports

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Left to Right:; (1) Big red spaghetti ball: the colorful fun of a failed print; (2) Successfully printed model of Chronos with supports; (3) Finished print of Chronos with all supports removed

Left to Right:
(1) Big red spaghetti ball: the colorful fun of a failed print
(2) Successfully printed model of Chronos with supports
(3) Finished print of Chronos with all supports removed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Final Thoughts

Collaborating with the Makerspace was incredible! With the zealous help of Mr. David, I was able to transform my project idea into a reality in about one week. Creation has never felt so possible. I would encourage anybody and everybody to visit the Makerspace. You never know when immersing yourself in a new environment and connecting with the experts and student workers involved will spark the desire to make something new. While every creative endeavor has a unique set of technical demands, ranging in complexity, getting started really is as simple as dropping by during Open Hours or sending a friendly email. I found this process enriching, fun, and informative, and I will definitely be working with the Makerspace team again soon.

My finished prints! From left to right: Chronos, Aion, and Kairos. Below: red spaghetti :)

My finished prints! From left to right: Chronos, Aion, and Kairos. Below: red spaghetti 🙂

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For explanations of the different paradigms of time these deities represent and the symbols included in the prints, please feel free to check out my final project!

 

Preserving History: How I used 3D scanning to preserve an ancient cuneiform tablet

I have always been someone who is interested in different languages. My passion sparked when me and my family moved to the United States from Venezuela, and I needed to learn English fast to help my family navigate this country, since they had less time to learn English than I did. Although I didn’t have an English tutor to formally teach me English, I taught myself most of my English through reading, which made me develop a love for languages in written form. Now, at Williams, I am a prospective Chinese Language major because I fell in love with the language after taking CHIN 101! So when I was given the opportunity to work on a project that was so related to my interest in languages, I jumped on it immediately.

Cuneiform is regarded as the earliest known writing system. These words are written into clay and then baked into a sturdy, but fragile tablet. I was also really surprised to learn that cuneiform was used to write several languages. I had the pleasure to work with When we got to work, I was filled with excitement, but also some anxiety about the unknowns. Anne Peale, a librarian that works closely with the college’s special collections. She taught me that this particular cuneiform tablet was (insert interview details here). She plans to use the 3D printed tablet for educational purposes, because the characters in the tablet are very legible and hold information about a person’s taxes. Not only would 3D printing the cuneiform tablet allow several iterations of it to be used outside of the special collections library, it also allows us to make the tablet bigger, which makes the writing a lot easier to read. I was really excited about all of this, and it honestly made me want to learn how to read this type of cuneiform!

When we got to work, I was honestly really nervous. I didn’t know what to expect. This project required a way to record the tablet’s intricate wedges and patterns in a way that makes the writing completely legible, so we decided to use the unfamiliar Creality scanner to 3D scan the cuneiform, digitizing it into a file form. In my opinion, the Creality software was really intuitive. It was fairly easy to connect it to the computer, and to figure out how to correctly configure the scan. The most challenging part of this project was figuring out how to scan the tablet in a way that fully recorded the writing. We had some challenges with this, as the most detailed scanning mode included stickers that told the scanner its location, and since we couldn’t place the stickers on the cuneiform, we had to place them in its perimeter, something that became really hard to deal with when we began to turn the scanner sideways to get the sides of the tablet, since it could no longer recognize the stickers due to the angle change. Another challenge we had was that the tablet was really hard to place in a balanced way that didn’t topple over, so we ended up putting a small weighted cushion to hold it up.

Since we couldn’t place the tablet in a way that was possible for us to capture all four sides in one scan, we had to do a scan for each of all four sides. Each side of the tablet took about twenty minutes to complete, and the Creality scanner is really heavy! Anne and I had to take turns scanning, and we were both so sore! Creality records 3D items by scanning each and every point on the item, and this tablet was so intricate that it had over a million points for each side! The more we scanned, the fewer points that were recorded, so we had to go around the item a lot slower and with a lot more complex angles to make sure we recorded every character.

After two hours, all sides were scanned. Now, the only thing that was left was to find a way to merge the different scans into the composite model of the tablet. Although the Creality software comes with a scan merging option, this did not work on our scans, so blender was used to merge it.

After a month, the 3D scanned cuneiform was ready! It was a lot bigger than the tablet, and a lot less fragile, and best of all, we now had a file that could be used for printing as many of these tablets as we want! I was really excited because it was also my first time getting to see a 3D scanned object up close, as well as hold it.

One side of the tablet is clearer than the other, so we are going to reprint the file as a resin print, because the material may help to raise the clarity of the 3D print. 

Working on this project was a true journey of growth for me. The complexity of 3D scanning and the delicate nature of the cuneiform tablet made every step a learning experience. There were moments when I felt challenged, uncertain about the technical aspects or the best way to handle the fragile tablet. But with each hurdle, I gained more confidence, honed my problem-solving skills, and improved my ability to think creatively under pressure. I have always been really interested in languages, and this project sparked an interest in the digital humanities and language preservation.The potential of 3D scanning in the field of digital humanities is endless. From preserving endangered artifacts to making them accessible to scholars and students around the globe, this technology ensures that history is no longer bound by geography or fragility. I couldn’t help but think, what other treasures could we preserve this way?

Studying Savannah Sparrows on Kent Island

The Williams lab studies Savannah sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis), small migratory songbirds that live in grassy fields across North America (Cornell Lab). Savannah sparrows have been the subject of a long term study at Bowdoin College’s field research station on Kent Island in New Brunswick, Canada. 

The Kent Island research station. Cabins and the main building are photographed from the field designated for Savannah sparrow, herring gull (Larus argentatus), and tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) research. (Photo credit: Dan Mennill)

The Kent Island research station. Cabins and the main building are photographed from the field designated for Savannah sparrow, herring gull (Larus argentatus), and tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) research. (Photo credit: Dan Mennill)

The Kent Island research station. Cabins and the main building are photographed from the field designated for Savannah sparrow, herring gull (Larus argentatus), and tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) research. 

Savannah sparrows have been recorded on Kent Island since the 1960s and their songs have been recorded intensively since 1980 (Williams et al., 2018). Clara Dixon, who thoroughly recorded songs in 1980 and 1982, inspired a continued in-depth study of Savannah sparrows to this day because their songs are an excellent model for studying cultural evolution, the socially learned traits of populations change, and the bird song learning has parallels with the development of human speech (Williams et al., 2022). Male Savannah sparrows learn components of their songs from various tutors, including their biological father, social father, and both hatching and breeding-year neighbors. They then use these songs to attract mates and defend their territories.

Savannah sparrow on Kent Island. A key characteristic to help identify these birds are their distinctive yellow plumage above the eye, as shown in the photo. (Photo credit: Dan Mennill).

Savannah sparrow on Kent Island. A key characteristic to help identify these birds are their distinctive yellow plumage above the eye, as shown in the photo. (Photo credit: Dan Mennill).

Professor Heather Williams first went to Kent Island in 1973, her first year of college. She has maintained her connection to the island, and realized the potential to contribute to the Savannah sparrow research by studying a local population in Williamstown since 2005. Birds are systematically color-banded—given a unique three band color combination on their legs so that they can be identified with binoculars—and their songs are recorded. In addition to analyzing songs, observing birds’ responses to variations in note count and spacing in songs is valuable for understanding which factors drive changes in song traits over time. To study birds’ reactions, our lab conducts playback experiments, which entail placing a speaker in the middle of a bird’s territory, playing stimuli of songs with either variable note spacing or note type, and recording a bird’s response. 

Example song from N.YR.

Example song from N.YR.

Birds may sing an additional ‘chuck’ note in either an earlier or later interval, variable spacing between x notes, and other soft notes that fall between the introductory notes. Last summer, we investigated what drives the changes in the occurrence and number of chuck notes in songs, and how the spacing of x and other notes may influence a bird’s reproductive success.

Henry Alexander '27 and Prof. Heather Williams in the field on Grand Manan, New Brunswick, Canada. Both Williams and Alexander carry microphones used to record bird songs. (Photo credit: Hannah Cumming)

Henry Alexander ‘27 and Prof. Heather Williams in the field on Grand Manan, New Brunswick, Canada. Both Williams and Alexander carry microphones used to record bird songs. (Photo credit: Hannah Cumming)

Birds typically seek out the source of the song in a playback study. Placing a fake bird near a hidden speaker can enhance a playback because the bird directs its behavior towards the specific target. Taxidermy Savannah sparrows have been used in such experiments, but as Professor Williams warned us throughout the summer, they do not last long. The real birds aggressively attack and eventually destroy that type of model. 

We asked the Makerspace to 3D print a durable bird that we could repeatedly use in these playback experiments. The students brought a free 3D model of a Song Sparrow to Alice Sore ’27, a Makerspace student worker, since it was similar in appearance to the Savannah Sparrows we study. Using Blender, Alice modified the model by removing the legs, which would have been too fragile to print and nearly impossible for the bird to balance on. She replaced them with a simple base that could be hidden among leaves or grass in the field. After an initial failed print, Alice successfully produced two near-perfect models, which were then handed over to our lab for painting. A member of our lab, Hannah Cumming ’28, who is a prospective Biology and Studio Art double major, painted the models to match a Savannah Sparrow’s typical plumage. A member of our lab, Hannah Cumming, who is a prospective Biology and Studio Art double major, then painted the model to match a Savannah sparrow’s typical plumage. We gave our two painted models an imaginary three-band color combination as their name, choosing B.OG (Black band on the left leg, Orange band over Green band on the right) for one, and GO.B (Green band over Orange band on the left leg, Black band on the right) for the other. The names were inspired by the amazing peatland environments on Kent Island. 

3D printed Savannah sparrow model created by the Makerspace. Our lab painted this bird to use in our field experiments.

3D printed Savannah sparrow model created by the Makerspace. Our lab painted this bird to use in our field experiments.

B.OB, a Williamstown bird, demonstrates our color-banding system. He has Black over a US Fish and Wildlife Service aluminum band on his left leg, and Orange over Black on his right leg (from the perspective of the bird). (Photo credit: Hannah Cumming)

B.OB, a Williamstown bird, demonstrates our color-banding system. He has Black over a US Fish and Wildlife Service aluminum band on his left leg, and Orange over Black on his right leg (from the perspective of the bird).  (Photo credit: Hannah Cumming)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B.OG, like some of his living and wild counterparts, migrated to Canada with our lab this summer to spend time on Kent Island. We used the model bird in playback experiments to test female responses to song variations. We placed B.OG in the mown path in the middle of a territory and hid the speaker nearby in taller grass. We then conducted the playback experiment to see whether females would respond aggressively to the songs or with intrigue. Approaches without aggression by a female would indicate that certain song traits are “sexier,” meaning the trait improves a male’s reproductive fitness. An aggressive approach would indicate that female choice is not driving changes in this song trait.

Kate Swann (‘26, left) and Hannah Cumming (‘28, right) excitedly preparing to conduct playback experiments on Kent Island. (Photo credit: Ian Kyle)

Kate Swann (‘26, left) and Hannah Cumming (‘28, right) excitedly preparing to conduct playback experiments on Kent Island. (Photo credit: Ian Kyle)

Due to the timing of our experiment, females were feeding their nestlings and did not respond to the songs or birds. Due to the timing of our experiment, when females were actively feeding their nestlings, they did not respond to the songs or birds. This highlighted for us the importance of seasonal timing in behavioral experiments.

We later used GO.B to test male responses in Williamstown. We placed the 3D printed model on a stake in the meadow and played songs to stimulate birds’ responses. Subjects flew around the model and treated it the same as live birds also sitting on posts: the subject approached the bird (whether live or 3D printed), and when it did not fly away, the subject returned to its original post.

This project also taught us how interdisciplinary collaboration between biology and technology can open up new methods for fieldwork. Our lab is excited to continue using the model birds in future research projects! In the future, we hope to expand the use of these models to test additional song traits and to explore how responses vary across seasons and populations.

B.OG perched on a Kent Island tree. We used this 3D printed and painted model to test female responses to song variations on Kent Island. (Photo credit: Heather Williams)

B.OG perched on a Kent Island tree. We used this 3D printed and painted model to test female responses to song variations on Kent Island. (Photo credit: Heather Williams)

B.OG analyzing his fellow birds’ songs, shown in the background. (Photo credit: Henry Alexander)

B.OG analyzing his fellow birds’ songs, shown in the background. (Photo credit: Hen

Kate Swann presented her research at the Summer Science Research Poster Session on August 8, 2025

Kate Swann presented her research at the Summer Science Research Poster Session on August 8, 2025

Works Cited

Cornell Lab or Ornithology. (2025). Savannah sparrow in All about birds. Cornell University. https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Savannah_Sparrow/overview

Williams, H. et al. (2018). The buzz segment of Savannah sparrow songs is a population marker. Journal of Ornithology 160, 217-227.

Williams, H. et al. (2022). Cumulative cultural evolution and mechanisms for cultural selection in wild bird songs. Nature Communications 13, 4001.

3D Printed Topographical Maps of Louisiana, Bhutan, and the Berkshires!

Arriving in the Berkshires

I arrived at Williams as a freshman never having visited the campus. Despite the admissions webpage’s best efforts to warn me, I was still shocked by the beauty of the mountains. Various trips to Pittsfield and Albany, mountain day hikes, and other excursions took me outside the main campus, but I couldn’t keep track of all the mountains, and I had little to no sense of the Berkshire geography. I put off looking closely at a map to orient myself because I kept thinking this would all be so much easier if I could just run my fingers over a topographical map of the area.

Creating Meaningful Gifts

Last semester, I decided that a 3D printed map of Williams would make a nice gift for my friends who were graduating. And, with the help of the website https://touchterrain.geol.iastate.edu/ and David Keiser-Clark at the makerspace, I made it happen. It was actually pretty easy. Touchterrain let me trace out the area I wanted a map of and download the elevation data as an STL file, which I sent to David, who got it printed.

The Process

When I first came to the Makerspace with an STL file of the Williams College campus, my goal was simple: create something meaningful for my graduating friends. I wanted to give them a small, lasting reminder of the place where we had spent the past four years. That idea soon grew into a larger project, with maps of Williamstown for several friends and a special map of coastal Louisiana for someone whose thesis focused on flooding in that region.

In addition to maps of Williamstown, we printed Paro, Bhutan for one of my friends who had studied abroad there and part of the Louisiana coastline (with the height scale exaggerated 500 times) for another friend who did his thesis on natural-technological disasters in that area and relied heavily on elevation maps.

The only map I kept for myself was a map of Amman, Jordan, where I studied abroad during my gap year. I returned there this summer thanks to funding from Williams’ Wohabe Fellowship, and one of the best parts of my trip was using my map to better understand the geography. By the end of my weeks there, I had a really solid grasp of the layout of the western side of the city and could place my memories from mysemester there in my mental understanding of the area.  

I’m really grateful to the Makerspace and David for helping me print these maps, and for anyone interested in 3D printing topographic maps at Williams, I’d recommend multi-colored filament so that the layers of the map change color with height and I’d warn that when painting a white print, some of the paint can find its way inside the plastic and get stuck there. (Also, for anyone looking for a good, online topographic map, I recently found the website https://en-gb.topographic-map.com/, which overlays color-coded elevation data onto Google Maps).

At the Makerspace, I experimented with materials and techniques. I tried different filament colors to see which would make the contours stand out best. For the Louisiana print, by exaggerating the elevation by 500 times, I brought out subtle topographical changes that are normally almost invisible. This choice created a striking visual effect and started conversations about how we interpret geographic data and how exaggeration can be used to reveal patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed.

Final Reflection

The final prints are more than just maps. They are pieces of memory, friendship, and curiosity. They invite touch and exploration. For me, they represent a way to connect academic learning, travel experiences, and personal relationships. For the friends who received them, they are a reminder of place and community at a moment of transition.

Revving Up STEM Education: Optimizing Mousetrap Cars for the Makerspace STEM Kits

Imagine a classroom of 5th graders buzzing with excitement as their mousetrap-powered cars zoom across the floor, each tweaking their design to outrace the others – all while learning the physics of potential and kinetic energy. That’s the vision behind the Williams College Makerspace’s Sustainable STEM Learning Kits project, and this semester, I had the chance to dive in, redesign a car from scratch, and use statistical methods to optimize its performance. Spoiler: it involved a paintbrush, some copper wire, and a magazine holder: improvisation at its finest!

Dual mousetrap powered car

Dual mousetrap powered car

Background: Building on a Legacy of Learning

This project builds on the groundwork laid by the Makerspace, Williams College CLiA, and the Zilkha Center through the TIDE Grant initiative, which aimed to create sustainable, reusable STEM kits for under-resourced 5th and 6th grade classrooms. As detailed in this Makerspace blog, one of the main ideas for the stem kits is a model car assembled from sustainable, reusable materials with some 3D-printed printed parts to teach energy concepts, aligning with Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Previous Makerspace student workers Divine Uwimana ’27 and Alice Sore ’27 created an initial design that used a rubber band to power the car. My work involved building up on and enhancing this initial design and exploring other forms of potential energy that could be used to power the car.

My Journey: From Brainstorming to Rapid Prototyping

Mousetrap car parts

Mousetrap car parts

Fusion360 flywheel model

Fusion360 flywheel model

I kicked things off by meeting with Divine Uwimana to understand the project’s history and progress. Then, I teamed up with Izzie Tarantino for this joint endeavor, guided by Makerspace Program Manager David Keiser-Clark. We brainstormed energy sources for the car: elastic bands, flywheels, mousetraps, and motors. Izzie focused on elastic energy (expanding on the previous work by Divine and Alice) and modular designs, while I explored flywheels and mousetraps. I initially designed a flywheel with 8 ball bearings but decided to pivot to the mousetrap car for this semester, leveraging the existing car body as a starting point.

Having dabbled in Fusion 360 during a previous photogrammetry project, I saw this as a chance to deepen my skills. I tried modifying the prior design, but missing sketches made it tricky, so I started from scratch. The learning curve was steep; I relearned Fusion 360 mirroring and shape patterns, tackled advanced concepts like threading an axle, and spent hours troubleshooting. After printing the car body, I turned to rapid prototyping to test ideas without wasting resources. For instance, I used a paintbrush as a pole to connect the mousetrap to the axle with a string. I also experimented with connecting two mouse traps in series, designing a scalable system where one trap triggers the next. To test this trigger mechanism, I improvised with cardboard and copper wire, containing the setup in a magazine holder – Makerspace creativity at its best!

Mousetrap car rapid prototyping: testing trigger mechanism in makeshift compartment

Mousetrap car rapid prototyping: testing trigger mechanism in makeshift compartment

Merging Design with Data: A Statistical Experiment

The project took an exciting turn when I realized it aligned perfectly with my Statistical Design of Experiments course (Stats 344). On one hand, I had an extracurricular project that was inherently experimental; on the other, I was learning statistical methods eager for application – a textbook case of supply meeting demand with zero opportunity cost! My Stats 344 team, consisting of Lee Mabhena ’25, Victor Cazabal ’25, and myself (26’), met at the Makerspace to run a 2^(7-4) fractional factorial experiment, testing seven factors: floor type (carpet vs. hard floor), wheel friction (high vs. low), string material (polyester vs. rubber band), number of mousetraps (one vs. two), pole length (short vs. long), car length (short vs. long), and added weight (0 g vs. 100 g). Our goal? Finding the combination that maximizes travel distance while identifying which factors matter most, enabling kids to experiment with configurations and compete.

After multiple experiments, including a central composite design, we pinpointed an optimal setup: 16.37 g weight and an 8.56-inch pole length, predicting a distance of 381.27 inches. Confirmatory runs (389.14, 380.88, and 350.55 inches) validated our model, and we confirmed that floor type, weight, number of mousetraps, and pole length significantly impact performance, while wheel friction, string material, and car length had less effect.

Factors affecting mousetrap car performance: floor type, pole length, and added weight

Factors affecting mousetrap car performance: floor type, pole length, and added weight

Reflections and Next Steps

This project was a game-changer for me. I sharpened my Fusion 360 skills, learned the value of rapid prototyping, and enjoyed my first Makerspace team collaboration with Izzie –our brainstorming sessions were a highlight! Looking ahead, I’d love to revisit the flywheel design as an energy source and eventually create a universal car body that supports multiple energy sources, like a “universal adapter” for elastic, flywheel, or mousetrap power. This would give students even more ways to explore physics while fostering creativity and competition. For now, I’m thrilled to have contributed to a project that empowers young learners and bridges classroom learning with hands-on innovation, helping students see science not as abstract equations, but as something they can build, test, and improve.

Hyperbolic Paraboloid: The Ball that Wouldn’t Roll Away

A still photo from a video of a sweeping hyperbolic paraboloid with a ball resting right at its unstable center. Photo courtesy of Brough Morris.

A still photo from a video of a sweeping hyperbolic paraboloid with a ball resting right at its unstable center. Photo courtesy of Brough Morris.

At first glance, the shape looks like a saddle, a sweeping hyperbolic paraboloid with a ball resting right at its unstable center. Under normal conditions, gravity would quickly win, sending the ball rolling away. But the magic begins when the surface rotates. Suddenly, what was once unstable becomes stable: the ball lingers at the top, as though defying gravity. This simple but mesmerizing demonstration is more than a parlor trick. It’s a tangible, mechanical analogy for a Paul Trap, a device used in quantum mechanics experiments to confine ions and electrons with oscillating electric fields.

The idea to bring this demonstration to Williams College originated in conversations with Professor Fred Strauch, who saw its potential for enriching the department’s Quantum Mechanics (PY301) course. Project owner Brough Morris, Instructional Support Specialist for Physics and Astronomy, and Makerspace student worker Alice Sore ‘27 took on the task of designing a version that could withstand repeated classroom use. Their challenge was to improve on an earlier fiberglass prototype, which only managed to keep the ball stable for about five seconds before imperfections in the surface or misalignment caused it to fail.

This photo displays the hyperbolic paraboloid (connected to a base with rotational motor) that the Makerspace 3D printed. Unlike fiberglass models, this included smooth curves and precise geometry and no bumps. The Makerspace has the largest 3D-printer beds on campus.

This photo displays the hyperbolic paraboloid (connected to a base with rotational motor) that the Makerspace 3D printed. Unlike fiberglass models, this included smooth curves and precise geometry and no bumps. The Makerspace has the largest 3D-printer beds on campus.

A 3D-printed model offered a promising solution. Unlike fiberglass, which introduced bumps and inconsistencies, 3D printing could produce smoother curves and more precise geometry. Brough designed the surface to be as wide as possible while still fitting in the Makerspace printer’s build area, which was larger than any other printer available on campus. Multiple design iterations in CAD ensured that the final geometry struck the right balance, shallow enough to reduce instability, but still faithful to the physics of a Paul Trap. Rigidity was also essential: any flexing or vibration in the surface during rotation would send the ball off course. To get the balance right, Brough consulted with Jason Mativi, Senior Science Center Shop Engineer, about print density and material strength, ensuring the final model would be both stable and durable.

The fabrication process involved careful modeling of the hyperbolic paraboloid in CAD. Once the paraboloid was printed and mounted on a rotating base, the demonstration came to life. Smooth, precise, and stable, the 3D-printed saddle surpassed the earlier fiberglass attempt, holding the ball far longer (see video) and illustrating the physics concept in a way that is both intuitive and unforgettable.

A critical addition to this setup is the custom control box that Brough and Kevin Forkey, Lab Supervisor and Lecturer in Physics, built to regulate the motor speed. The experiment only works in a narrow frequency range, around 100 rpm. A little too fast or too slow and the ball will slowly drift away from the center before eventually flying off. At the correct speed, though, the ball doesn’t just sit precariously balanced, it truly stabilizes. If nudged slightly, it self-corrects and returns to the center. This visual proof of a dynamically stable equilibrium makes the analogy to the Paul Trap even more compelling.

Another photo of the hyperbolic paraboloid printed by the Makerspace.

Another photo of the hyperbolic paraboloid printed by the Makerspace.

The project draws inspiration from a similar setup at Harvard, but with a Williams Makerspace twist. The collaboration between Brough and Alice highlights how a mix of creativity, technical skill, and persistence can transform abstract concepts into hands-on learning tools. By June 2025, the hyperbolic paraboloid demonstration will be ready for classroom use, giving physics students a chance to see, not just imagine, how stability can emerge from instability. With the wires cleaned up and the motor properly mounted, the demonstration is now classroom-ready and will be used in Quantum Mechanics (PY301) starting June 2025.

What makes this project exciting is not only the final product but what it represents, the blending of mathematical surfaces, modern fabrication techniques, and physics pedagogy. In the classroom, the spinning saddle offers more than a visual spectacle. It anchors a difficult idea: the dynamic stabilization of particles in a Paul Trap in an experience that students can watch unfold before their eyes. It’s proof that sometimes, the best way to teach quantum mechanics is to let a ball roll across a 3D-printed saddle and show that, with the right motion, even instability can be tamed.

Does Optogenetic Inactivation of TRPA1-expressing Neurons Diminish Heat Avoidance in Drosophila Larvae?

Authors: Claire Colvin ’27, Tess Everett ’27, Shiv Patel ’27. 

For our Neuroethology class (NSCI 324/BIOL 314) with Professor Charlotte Barkan, we decided to explore the extent to which TRPA1, an ion channel expressed by heat-sensing neurons, is involved in heat sensation. We wished to use optogenetics to investigate how the inactivation of cells expressing this channel influenced heat avoidance behaviors in Drosophila larvae. In order to inactivate the channel under blue light, we crossed two fly lines (UAS-ACR2 and GAL4-TRPA1) and used their resulting progeny. 

Students in Neuroethology 324 class collaborate with the Makerspace to create a dual-chamber water bath

Students in Neuroethology 324 class collaborate with the Makerspace to create a dual-chamber water bath

To observe heat avoidance in ambient versus blue light, we wanted to create a model that could maintain a heat gradient with a cold and hot side of the arena (a Petri–dish). This led us to partner with the Makerspace to bring this experimental design to life. We helped design and then Makerspace student worker Izzie Tarantino ‘28 modeled and 3D printed a dual-chamber water bath that allowed us to cool and heat each side individually. The arena was partially submerged within the model, allowing for the creation of a temperature gradient to observe larval behavior. Heat avoidance behavior was quantified by recording the number of larvae present on each side of the arena at 30–second intervals over 5 minutes. We hypothesized that the inactivation of TRPA1 (blue light condition) would disrupt heat detection, manifesting as reduced heat avoidance of the hot side of the arena. 

Early data acquisition: small change in temperature

Early data acquisition: small change in temperature

During our data collection, we learned that the temperature of the water did not exactly reflect the temperature of the arena. This was due to the material within the Petri-dish, called agar. While this substance is crucial because it facilitates larval movement, agar is not particularly conductive to heat. The cold side of the arena was warmer than the surrounding cold water beneath it, and the hot side of the arena was cooler than the surrounding hot water. This led us to adjust our methods. First, we opted for more extreme water temperatures within each chamber to achieve a true temperature gradient. We also decided to use an infrared thermometer to ensure we knew the exact temperature experienced by the larvae on the surface of the arena, instead of using the temperatures of the water below as a proxy. With these adjustments, we gathered much better data. 

Later data acquisition: larger change in temperature

Later data acquisition: larger change in temperature

Our preliminary results showed that the inactivation of TRPA1 partially leads to the reduction of heat avoidance behaviors, following our hypothesis that TRPA1 is involved in heat sensation, but demonstrating that TRPA1 is not the only ion channel involved in temperature detection. We would like to note that due to the few trials performed, these results are not statistically significant, and more experiments are required to confirm the viability of our findings. 

Special thanks to Jason Mativi (Senior Science Center Shop Engineer) and David Keiser-Clark (Makerspace Program Manager) for supporting our work.

For more in-depth information about our project and results, our final presentation and lab report are linked below:

Just us being goofy

Just us being goofy

 

Mayan Tenon: Bringing the Past to Life with 3D Printing

Background

Mayan "Human Head Emerging from Monster Jaws", Late Classic, 600-900 CE, 125 lb., Object number: 1870.1.2

Mayan “Human Head Emerging from Monster Jaws”, Late Classic, 600-900 CE, 125 lb., Object number: 1870.1.2

College campuses hold a wealth of history, blending the stories of their institutions and community with those of the wider world. The epitome of this fascinating history can be found in the Williams College Museum of Art (WCMA). Among the thousands of objects housed here, some carry tales of adventure, cultural exchange, and intrigue that transport us back in time. Between 1870 and 1871, two Williams students took a Lyceum-sponsored trip to Honduras and Belize where they acquired two Maya tenons in the town of Corozal and brought them back to Williams College, where they remain today. These tenons are now studied as part of anthropology and art history courses at the college and have been on view in Object Lab and other exhibitions at WCMA. More information about these artifacts can be found in a student research paper written in 2019. 

Given their fascinating history with the college, the WCMA wanted to send the above pictured tenon, object number 1870.1.2, to the Beatriz Cortez x rafa esparza: Earth and Cosmos exhibition in New York City. The Earth and Cosmos exhibit celebrates cultural and artistic ties to ancient civilizations, making the tenon a fitting addition. However, the tenon is fragile, sculpted from soft limestone, and heavy, about 125 pounds. If it were to be shipped to the show, it would have been a miracle if it arrived in one piece. This logistical nightmare prompted Beth Fischer, WCMA’s Assistant Curator of Digital Learning and Research and Lecturer, to reach out to the Makerspace and request a 3D printed copy at a 1:1 scale model. She even shared the high-resolution photogrammetry 3D scan that she had completed during the pandemic. 

Although shipping a reproduced object eliminates any fear of damage to the original, 3D printing still raises a series of challenges. First, the tenon is significantly larger (23 1/4″ × 8 1/2″ × 18″) than our largest printing bed, meaning we must print it in quadrants and glue them together in the post-processing stage. Second, 3D-printed objects can be fragile, and they may chip or crack if they are jostled during shipping. Third, how do you best transform a 100% plastic object into a material resembling aged limestone?

One quadrant of the 3D printed tenon fills most of the available bed space on the Makerspace's Prusa XL 3D printer; note the "tree supports" are still attached

One quadrant of the 3D printed tenon fills most of the available bed space on the Makerspace’s Prusa XL 3D printer; note the “tree supports” are still attached

Printing

We resolved the oversized nature of this object by dividing our model into four roughly equal parts. We printed each quarter separately, and the actual printing times ranged between 10 and 34 hours per each quarter—for a total of about four days of nearly continuous printing.

We briefly experimented with adding mass to the 3D print by pausing the print midway through, then adding steel BBs into the hollow interior infill, and then completing the print. We decided there was little benefit to adding mass, as the object would be on display and would not be handled by the public. We instead focused on durability for shipping purposes. We selected our settings and printed a test piece (representing 1/32 of the entire object) that we then dropped and kicked to subject it to the kind of rough handling it might experience during shipping. We found that a 3mm shell provided a sturdy and durable object. We printed in Sunlu PLA Meta 1.75mm filament (white) with the following specifications: 0.2mm layer height (speed), 15% infill density, triangular fill pattern (low density, strong, fast), and organic tree supports (easy to remove). We configured the Prusa XL to auto-swap filament rolls as each successive 1kg PLA roll ran out. For the largest (34-hour prints), we used 2.3 rolls, and this hot-swapping meant increased efficiency because we did not have to babysit it. 

We created the model’s stone-like appearance using a post-processing technique that the Williams Makerspace learned last spring semester from two (then) local 5th graders: Elizabeth Heeringa (she invented the technique) and Anderson Keiser-Clark. Together they applied this technique to a pair of large-format 3D printed Spruces Lions that supported Giuseppina Forte’s ARTS 222 Critical Practice of Architecture: Theories, Methods, and Techniques course. These lions were exhibited in the Williams 2024 Spring Big Arts Show.

Post-Processing Recipe

We used luthier’s woodworking tools (scrapers) to remove extraneous plastic from the flat sides of each quadrant. We then superglued the four quadrants together with CA (cyanoacrylate) glue, and applied three layers of 3M Bondo (a thick epoxy putty used in automobile repair) to hide the seams. We let that dry and then hand-brushed two thin coats of DRYLOK Original Concrete & Masonry Waterproofer; this helped convert the plastic PLA surface texture to the more sandy and gritty nature of the DRYLOCK paint.

We used luthier's woodworking tools (scrapers) to smooth the flat sides of the PLA blocks

We used luthier’s woodworking tools (scrapers) to smooth the flat sides of the PLA blocks

Mayan "Human Head Emerging from Monster Jaws", Late Classic, 600-900 CE, 125 lb., Object number: 1870.1.2

3D printed tenon: 3 of 4 printed quadrants (organic tree supports remain on the lower right block)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3D printed tenon: 4 of 4 printed quadrants (organic tree supports remain on the two blocks on right side)

3D printed tenon: 4 of 4 printed quadrants (organic tree supports remain on the two blocks on right side)

Applying the third layer of 3M Bondo (a thick epoxy putty used in automobile repair) to hide the seams

Applying the third layer of 3M Bondo (a thick epoxy putty used in automobile repair) to hide the seams

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finally, we created an acrylic wash solution by filling two spray bottles (one black, one brown) with a solution of 15% acrylic paint and 85% water. We sprayed on 4 coats, allowing 24 hours to dry between each. It sprays on quite dark, but then dramatically lightens as it drips off. Iterative coats allowed us more control over achieving our final desired outcome.

The 3D printed tenon after being painted with two coats of DRYLOK Original Concrete & Masonry Waterproofer

The 3D printed tenon after being painted with two coats of DRYLOK Original Concrete & Masonry Waterproofer

We were excited to accidentally discover that using a painting hood with strong ventilation (to reduce our exposure to the DRYLOK fumes) changed the spray bottle output and turned it into a very fast-moving and fine mist (think: atomized), and that nearly eliminated drippy streaks. We attempted to use our two colors to recreate the variegated tones of natural limestone by adding extra solution to nooks and crannies, and then we dry-brushed the visual highlights with a stiff, fine brush (using pure acrylic paint) to add some texture. Our goal was never to color match the original Mayan tenon, but rather to create a realistic looking substitute that could be interpreted as being limestone. The painting was completed by Lisa Dorin, Deputy Director of WCMA, and David Keiser-Clark, Makerspace Program Manager.

 

Lisa Dorin, Deputy Director of the WCMA, spraying the 3D printed tenon with an acrylic wash

The 3D printed tenon after being painted with two coats of DRYLOK Original Concrete & Masonry Waterproofer

Side view of the final 3D printed tenon, after post-processing, weighs about 20 pounds

Side view of the final 3D printed tenon, after post-processing, weighs about 20 pounds

Front view of the final 3D printed tenon, after post-processing, weighs about 20 pounds

Front view of the final 3D printed tenon, after post-processing, weighs about 20 pounds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NYC Exhibition

The final 3D printed tenon was visually stunning, weighed about 20 pounds, and was successfully shipped to Earth and Cosmos, where it is being exhibited from January 29 through May 17, 2025. Beatriz Cortez was very happy with the result and hopes to be able to borrow the print again for future exhibitions. This exhibition-quality 3D print acts as a fascinating interface between artistic expression and cutting-edge technology. Although it was artificially fabricated, it still carries the history and cultural significance of the original piece in a manner that can be transported from location to location and shared with the broader community. This work is a part of Williams College’s story, but also a part of many other stories, and I’m thankful to have had the opportunity to share it. 

3D printed tenon being wrapped for shipment to exhibition in New York City

3D printed tenon being wrapped for shipment to exhibition in New York City

3D printed tenon on display at Earth and Cosmos exhibition, New York City

3D printed tenon on display at Earth and Cosmos exhibition, New York City

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acknowledgments

This project was made possible thanks to the collaborative efforts of Beth Fischer and Lisa Dorin (WCMA) and Makerspace student workers Harris Longfield ’27 (me) and Elena Sore ’27, with support from David Keiser-Clark.

Publications Mentioning this Work

 

Life After Williams: Stitching Memories Workshop

Contents of upcycled mending kit includes a block printed "Strive for Zero Waste" by Leni Fried of the Old Stone Mill Center.

Contents of upcycled mending kit includes a block printed “Strive for Zero Waste” by Leni Fried of the Old Stone Mill Center.

As a Resident Director, one of my responsibilities is to plan and execute a Life After Williams (LAW) event. LAW events are designed to teach students practical skills that will be useful after we leave Williams, skills that we might not learn in the classroom. For my LAW event, I decided to partner with the FabLab to hold a mending and hemming workshop. Participants were invited to learn basic sewing skills and take home a mending kit, promoting both self-sufficiency and sustainability.

To plan this event, I reached out to David Keiser-Clark, Makerspace Program Manager, who was truly invaluable throughout the process. He connected with the Old Stone Mill Center, a zero-waste makerspace in nearby Adams, MA, and sourced mending kits for our workshop including upcycled materials such as antique sewing scissors, button thread, regular thread, denim scraps for patches, embroidery thread, cork, pins, safety pins, sewing needles, a few buttons, chalk, and a thimble. The Old Stone Mill assembled these materials into custom zippered pouches that they created from upholstery samples.

Students participating in the Life After Williams workshop created by the Residential Life Team

Students participating in the Life After Williams workshop created by the Residential Life Team

50 upcycled mending kits for this and future mending workshops, created by the Old Stone Mill Center in Adams, MA

50 upcycled mending kits for this and future mending workshops, created by the Old Stone Mill Center in Adams, MA

Students participating in the Life After Williams workshop created by the Residential Life Team

Students participating in the Life After Williams workshop created by the Residential Life Team

Final elements, such as fabric tape measures, in-house 3D printed sheaths (for the scissors), seam rippers, and industrial thread, were added to each kit the day before the event. Each kit was a unique work of art and clearly made with care. The event was held on the final day of Earth Month, and I’m grateful to the Zilkha Center for helping to publicize it.

Reflecting on the event itself, I would say it was a great success. I am grateful to Maile Ruiz ‘26, a FabLab student worker, for sharing her expertise as an instructor. Nine students attended, and two of them learned to sew for the first time. I personally mended one of my favorite scrunchies and helped a fellow senior fix the cuff of her sweater. As we all sat around the table, our conversation revolved around the emotional and environmental value of caring for clothing. The senior reflected that she had brought the sweater with her to study abroad and therefore it held memories for her. In repairing it, not only was she able to decrease clothing waste, she was also able to retain the physical reminder of her memories. It was gratifying to know that these kits might empower students to take more agency in maintaining their clothes and, by extension, in reducing waste.

(Thank you to Anderson Keiser-Clark for contributing his Fusion360 design for the scissors sheath. We 3D printed these in flexible TPU (50% infill) and they offer a perfect grip.)

PrusaXL 3D printing a batch of scissors guards

PrusaXL 3D printing a batch of scissors guards

Fusion360 design for the scissors sheath.

Fusion360 design for the scissors sheath.

 

LIFT Program at the Makerspace

Casen working with the Prusa XL 3D printer

Casen working with the Prusa XL 3D printer

The Learning Interventions for Teens (LIFT) program is a mentorship-based program held at Williams every winter study. This program pairs Williams College students with teenagers involved with the Berkshire County juvenile justice system. It offers teenagers an opportunity for personal growth, skill-building, and creative exploration. Over the course of three weeks, students engage in hands-on projects centered around art, photography, 3D printing, and other disciplines.

During our 2025 winter study, the Makerspace partnered with one of the mentor-mentee pairs, Sarah Sousa ’28 and Casen, respectively. Casen was interested in 3D printing and was eager to learn more about how he could use it for his project. Casen was interested in printing two cars that he envisioned using a black filament. David Keiser-Clark, the Makerspace Program Manager, and I gave Sarah and Casen a tour of the Makerspace and shared an overview of all the resources and tools that were available to them. I then worked with Casen and showed him the entire procedure involved in 3D printing, starting from slicing the 3D models to loading the filament and eventually initiating the print. After our demonstration, Casen was ready to implement the entire 3D printing process by himself.

One of Casen's 3D printed model cars

One of Casen’s 3D printed model cars

Altogether, the printing process for both cars took two days to complete. Once the prints were finished, the task of removing the supports—structures that help to stabilize the print during the process—was still a challenge. Removing the supports is usually straightforward, but it was a tricky process for these cars, yet Casen carefully removed them without damaging the prints. He was very patient with it and developed his own innovative techniques to remove them. 

During this time, Casen and Sarah also worked together on their final presentation—which I had the chance to attend on the last day of Winter Study. It was exciting to see all of the interesting projects that students in the program had been working on. The projects covered a range of topics, including nail art, attorney mentorship, and music. It was also lovely to see mentors and mentees receive their certificates of completion. I felt genuinely inspired to see how Williams’ resources helped Casen and other students explore and build upon their interests.

Printing History: Bringing The Beaver Mill Back to Life

Inspiration to Creation

Photo of the Beaver Mill geographical area from the Big Art Show. The material used is eucalyptus matt board, an environmentally friendly product as compared to traditional acrylic or MDF, and it was laser cut in the Science Shop on an Epilog Laser Helix machine.

Photo of the Beaver Mill geographical area from the Big Art Show. The material used is eucalyptus matt board, an environmentally friendly product as compared to traditional acrylic or MDF, and it was laser cut in the Science Shop on an Epilog Laser Helix machine.

The first time the digital blueprint of the Beaver Mill appeared on my computer screen, I could hardly imagine it becoming real. This historic site, standing quietly in North Adams, was about to transform from a mere collection of pixels into a tangible piece of art. As part of Grace Espinosa’s ’26 ARTS 222 – Critical Practice of Architecture course, our mission was bold yet simple: craft a detailed 3D printed model for the Williams College Big Art Show. Beyond being an academic project, our process and production turned out to be a dynamic intersection of art, technology, architecture, and history.

Grace, the stakeholder and driving artistic force behind this project, shared her vision clearly: “We were inspired to create a 3D printed model of the Beaver Mill to introduce in the architecture section of the Big Art Show.” She wanted viewers to vividly experience the historical site students had been exploring all semester, bringing their classroom discussions to life in a practical, memorable way.

ARTS 222, taught by Assistant Professor of Architecture and Environmental Studies Giuseppina Forte, challenges students to transform architectural spaces through innovative design interventions. Throughout the semester, students develop skills in architectural drawing, graphic design, and digital and physical 3D modeling. They also engage deeply with design strategies such as spatial hijacking and détournement, learning to rethink conventional ideas of space and time. This Beaver Mill project has become a practical demonstration of these powerful ideas.

Navigating Challenges with Creativity

This is a 3D rendering of a split-section of the Beaver Mill that we printed so as to be able to test the internal structural integrity.

This is a 3D rendering of a split-section of the Beaver Mill that we printed so as to be able to test the internal structural integrity.

Our biggest challenge? The size limitations of the Makerspace’s 3D printers. The solution was as simple as it was elegant: we used the Prusa Slicer to split the model into three parts. While this meant a careful, precise assembly with glue afterward, it allowed us to maximize scale and achieve a stunning 24-inch model. Grace noted, with satisfaction, that splitting the model “didn’t impact the final presentation much,” making this strategic decision effective in the end.

Collaboration: Art Meets Technology

This is one of three printed parts of the Beaver Mill. We printed it with "organic tree supports" that are designed to support overhanging structures (like the roof overhangs). We later removed these supports and the result was a cleanly printed section of the building.

This is one of three printed parts of the Beaver Mill. We printed it with “organic tree supports” that are designed to support overhanging structures (like the roof overhangs). We later removed these supports and the result was a cleanly printed section of the building.

Grace had never attempted 3D printing before, making the Makerspace’s role in the project essential. She described this collaboration as transformative: “Working with the Makerspace made the project possible… your facilities and technical knowledge brought the model to a much higher level.”

David Keiser-Clark, Makerspace Program Manager, explains how the Beaver Mill project perfectly embodies the Makerspace’s mission of providing practical, hands-on experience with digital fabrication. “This project directly supported the architectural course goals by giving students real-world experience in modeling and computer-aided design software,” David stated.

David firmly believes in interdisciplinary learning, emphasizing that projects like the Beaver Mill offer students invaluable skills. “Interdisciplinary collaboration encourages critical thinking and practical problem-solving skills students carry forward into their careers and lives beyond Williams,” he explained. This project perfectly encapsulated the blending of creative artistry and technical proficiency.

The Spirit of the Beaver Mill

Grace envisioned visitors observing and actively engaging with the model, appreciating the Beaver Mill’s distinctive texture and structure. The carefully chosen scale and attention to detail turned the model into an interactive experience, inspiring curiosity and exploration about the site’s potential as an artistic hub.

This is the left-most section of the Beaver Mill building with most of the external tree supports removed.

This is the left-most section of the Beaver Mill building with most of the external tree supports removed.

This is the final 3D printed object with all three sections glued together, using cyanoacrylate (CA) glue!

This is the final 3D printed object with all three sections glued together, using cyanoacrylate (CA) glue!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Magic Moment

This is the finished Beaver Mill model, as it appeared in the Big Art Show. This model shows the post-processing acrylic painting that Grace Espinosa '26 applied!

This is the finished Beaver Mill model, as it appeared in the Big Art Show. This model shows the post-processing acrylic painting that Grace Espinosa ’26 applied!

For Grace, the project’s highlight was unmistakable: “Seeing the model printed for the first time was incredibly rewarding.” After countless hours of refining the digital design, watching the Beaver Mill physically materialize felt almost magical. This moment embodies the Makerspace spirit: turning ambitious ideas into real, tangible outcomes through creativity, technology, and collaboration.

Projects like the Beaver Mill not only captivate participants and viewers but also shape the Makerspace’s future. David highlighted that “each new project fosters deeper connections and opens doors to innovative ideas across the campus.” Events like the Big Art Show and reflecting on these stories inspire future ambitious projects, encouraging faculty and students alike to imagine what’s possible.

Reflecting on the Beaver Mill project, it’s clear that the Makerspace is more than a lab—it’s a space where creativity and technology meet, where collaboration flourishes, and where students like Grace (and myself!) can transform dreams into realities!

Who knows what we’ll create next?

 

How We Added Webcams to our 3D Printers

The Importance of Remote Monitoring

A screenshot showcasing the Prusa Connect web portal for a Prusa XL printer.

A screenshot showcasing the Prusa Connect web portal for a Prusa XL printer.

This past academic year, I enabled remote monitoring for our Prusa XL and Prusa MK3S printers. I did this because it makes life a bit easier for us student workers. 3D printers are a fickle technology, and failed prints are common due to an object failing to adhere to the print bed, the filament becoming tangled, or a variety of other common issues. Because of this, many Makerspace workers have resorted to stopping by the Makerspace multiple times during long prints, making sure everything is going according to plan. For this reason, Prusa has designed a piece of software called PrusaLink that can connect both their older and newer printers to the Prusa Connect web portal. Upon learning of this, I began to work towards connecting our printers to the Internet so we could check on the status of prints in real-time and even cancel failing prints, all from our phones.

Bringing the Printers Online

A close-up view of the Raspberry Pi Zero 2W Single-Board Computer with a 3D-Printed Bracket attached to it and 4 pins soldered to the board.

A close-up view of the Raspberry Pi Zero 2W Single-Board Computer with a 3D-Printed Bracket attached to it and 4 pins soldered to the board.

For our Prusa XL, this task was easy. The Prusa XL, being a newer printer, has native support for Wi-Fi and simply requires connecting it to the Williams College network. However, some modifications were necessary for our older Prusa MK3S printers. For each of those, I connected a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W single-board computer. This small board, the one pictured above, is an entire computer that can connect to the back of our 3D printers using four pins I soldered to it. These pins transfer power from the 3D printer to the tiny computer, as well as data about the printer which is then sent over the Internet. This is achieved through a software called PrusaLink, a custom Linux-based operating system developed by Prusa that runs on the board.

I soldered these pins, installed the operating system onto a micro-sd card, and mounted a 3D printed bracket designed to prevent electrical shorts with double-sided tape.  I then plugged the boards into the back of the 3D printer and powered them back on. Once powered on, we connected to the IP address listed on the printer’s screen, configured them for remote monitoring, and were able to start monitoring! We could now view the current status of the printers, control them, and upload files to them remotely! However, there was still one problem – we could not yet visually monitor the prints.

Installing Cameras

A 3D-printed camera mount attached to a Prusa MK3S.

A 3D-printed camera mount attached to a Prusa MK3S.

For all of our printers, we ended up designing custom mounts for the camera module we purchased, the Arducam OV5647. This module was chosen because of its cheap price, good-enough visual quality, and direct connection to the Raspberry Pi’s camera connector via a ribbon cable. Our main design principles were that we wanted a mount that followed the nozzle so the current layer was always in the center of the camera, while still showing the print below. I attached this mount to the X motor carriage on the Prusa MK3S, as this allows the camera to stay focused on the printhead. The hexagon pattern matches Prusa’s design language with their printers while preserving airflow, as the fan on the printhead can move very close to the camera mount. I have released this design to the public, and you can find both the STL and Fusion 360 files on the Printables website

A case designed to hold a raspberry pi zero and a camera module monitors a print on the Prusa XL.

A case designed to hold a raspberry pi zero and a camera module monitors a print on the Prusa XL.

For the Prusa XL, a different design was used. The XL has all the functionality of PrusaLink built in, but without a way to directly connect a camera. Therefore, we used the same single-board computer, a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W, running the 64-bit release of Raspberry Pi OS Lite. This gives us a very lightweight operating system that is accessible through the command line for running software. On this computer we set up this code by a github user, which uses the API provided by Prusa to send snapshots from the camera every 10 seconds to the Prusa Connect web portal. I found this mount for a standard webcam on the Printables website, and built my design based on this, adding a box where the webcam would normally mount onto it that holds the Pi Zero and the camera module. This design ended up working perfectly, and is what we are using today.

Real-Time Slack Notifications

Prusa XL Printer Notifications. Text Reads: Prusa XL: Printer requires your attention. Check it personally to make sure everything is in order. Prusa XL: Print job Body1_PETG_2h11m.gcode was stopped. Remove the printout from the printer and prepare the printer for the next print job.

A photograph of a slack notification for our Prusa XL printer.

The remote monitoring system shares temperature data, the percentage of the project remaining, visual photographs, and also notifies us if the printer encounters an issue or if the print fails. If, for example, the spool runs out of filament in the middle of printing, the print pauses and we get a Slack notification letting us know details about the issue. The notification contains a link to the Prusa app (on our phones) for more information. This lets us solve these problems when they come up, instead of finding out the next day.

Conclusion

Connecting our printers to the Internet has been a major help at the Makerspace. It makes monitoring easier, allows us to upload files directly from our laptops to the 3D printers (via our network), and lets us confirm that prints are going smoothly or catch issues before they become a major problem — without having to step foot in the office. Remote monitoring for our 3D printers has been a massive help in allowing us to continue providing high-quality 3D prints for our community.

Next Steps

This summer the Makerspace will be upgrading our MK3S Printers, and building two new high-speed Prusa MK4S 3D printers. I plan to connect all of our 3D printers to our remote monitoring system. If you are interested in connecting your own Prusa 3D Printers to the Internet with Prusa Connect, you can find official guides on how to do so here for all compatible models.

 

Makerspace Shoutout from Jack Murphy ’25

Thank you to the Makerspace!

Model of Neoclassical Modernist Home in Rome, Italy

Model of Neoclassical Modernist Home in Rome, Italy

The Makerspace empowered me, somebody with no model-building experience, to create an architectural model of a home in Rome, Italy that I am proud of—they even lent me the tools to make it happen. I am grateful to  David Keiser-Clark, Makerspace Program Manager, for offering guidance in this design project. This Neoclassical Modernist home was inspired by my time spent last spring studying abroad in Rome, Italy, and David helped me design this relatively low-tech model for my architecture class, taught by the great and powerful Professor Michael Lewis. As an economics major, I had never created anything like this, so I enlisted David to help me solve some practical problems that were preventing me from getting the design to look as accurate as I’d hoped. Specifically, I needed help to understand how to get the proportions of arches to look correct, and how I could properly cut and fill these voids. Due to the nature of the project, I wanted this to be done by hand, so David’s first idea of 3D printing the walls was not practical, so he worked with me to trace voussoirs into both the poster board walls and the plexiglass windows, a material that he referred me to. In addition, we grappled with the idea of how to properly include a glass dome in my model. David had the wonderful idea to buy a clear plastic bowl from Walmart and then set the scale of the entire model off of the measurement of this piece. David and I had many ideas about how to create the most interesting model possible, but his genius lies in the simplicity of his solutions to these practical problems. Being well-versed in the world of 3D printing, he was tempted to create bespoke parts for the project, but I was impressed with his restraint, ingenuity, and creativity to use more common items to solve these issues using a fraction of the time, labor, and resources.  In addition to his more high-tech tools in the Makerspace, David keeps a plethora of different tools that made this project possible and accessible for a student like me. He has compasses, saws, scoring equipment, clamps, and countless other items that allow students to have a one-stop shop for making their creative vision into a reality. I cannot thank David enough for all of the help and support, and I would recommend that anyone at the College and beyond come check out what he is doing, as it is extremely interesting and unique in a college landscape. Below, I included a write-up on my project for anyone interested. Thank you David & the Makerspace!

Jack Murphy
Modern Architecture
Professor Lewis
11 November 2024

Neoclassical Modernist Home in Rome, Italy

My vacation house in Rome, Italy features Classicist architecture with a modernized design that subverts the traditional Roman order to provide the home with aesthetic and functional attributes never seen in ancient Rome. More specifically, the house is located in the Aurelio District above Vatican City at 41º53’21.56” N, 12º27’02.88” E. This undeveloped plot of grassland (1.2 acres) is located directly across the street from Villino Algardi, a government-owned villa where meetings are held. Villino Algardi sits inside Villa Doria Pamphili, a massive public park where Romans escape the city and have picnics with their families. The house faces north and sits at 246 feet of elevation, 0.95 miles away from Vatican City (50 feet of elevation), providing spectacular views of the entirety of downtown Rome. This area provides me with a unique location just outside of the city, views of the scenic city, and distance from the highly traditional architectural standards that my home violates. 

In essence, my home’s exterior is meant to mimic buildings like the Pantheon, Parthenon, and countless other Roman Temples. It features a portico and dome similar in silhouette to the Pantheon, but I decided to make the “rotunda” square due to the difficulty in creating a circular floorplan for home applications. To allude to this building, I included arches on all four sides with glass beneath to provide excellent natural light into all rooms. The ground floor features a dividing wall in the middle, with a great room in front and a bedroom in the back. The great room includes a dining room and kitchen with an island in the middle, allowing me to entertain guests during dinner parties essential to Roman culture. In total, this room sums up to 332 square feet, giving me space for indoor functions and direct access to the portico for aperitivo (afternoon cocktail hour) as the sun sets over the Roman cityscape. The rear half of the ground floor features a bedroom, bathroom (accessible from both sides of the ground floor), and walk-in closet, allowing for comfortable living for me and my future wife. I chose to put the bedroom on the western side of the home to prevent the morning sun from waking me too early as I relax on vacation. The one bathroom is located on the east side of the home, with the option to soak in the morning sun as you prepare for the day or to pull blinds down for extra privacy. Back in the great room, a staircase climbs the dividing wall to allow access to the semi-circular loft inside of the glass dome, overlooking all of Rome. This room includes a sectional couch and TV and serves as an excellent living space to watch sunsets or stargaze with friends and loved ones. This sectional can also pull out to allow for additional sleeping space for guests of the home looking for one of the most beautiful and unique living arrangements imaginable. The loft is semicircular, allowing for natural light to permeate into the great room as you cook lunch and enjoy days off on the weekend. A long basalt-cobblestone driveway connects the property to Via Aurelia Antica, cutting under an ancient Roman aqueduct’s arch that provides privacy from the passing traffic. 

One of the chief inspirations for this home was Hagia Sophia of the East Roman Empire. This building collapsed 21 years after its construction in 558 AD due to the difficulty of supporting a round dome on a rectangular rotunda. This problem led to the invention of pendentives, which use arches on all 4 sides and diagonal arches across the hypotenuse of the rotunda to distribute force away from weak points towards the middle of the rectangular floorplan and into the corners of the structure. I decided to use a light glass dome for reasons listed later, so pendentives are unnecessary due to their juxtaposition with the heavier brick-and-mortar dome of Hagia Sophia. Interestingly, this building has been modernized in its own way, as it was converted into a mosque in 1453 following the Ottoman invasion of Constantinople. While I didn’t end up needing to use pendentives, Hagia Sophia served as a major inspiration for the silhouette of my home as it was the first time that a round dome was placed on a rectangular building in any part of the Roman Empire.

The use of glass serves as a way to improve upon traditional Roman architecture using modern materials. Firstly, glass allows for the use of arches in the design, tying in the aforementioned inspiration of Hagia Sophia with the practicality of an enclosed structure. Furthermore, glass allows me to subvert the ideas of modern architecture into the form of classicism. I found myself fascinated by the transparency of the Seagram Building and the Crown Hall (Ludwig Mies van der Rohe) and wanted to incorporate this into my home. In addition, the oculus of the Pantheon served as inspiration for the dome, as I took this idea and wanted to maximize natural lighting past what Roman architects were capable of due to material limitations. Ancient Romans never had access to the quantity of glass that we do today, so I wanted to use the figure of a classical dome with the transparency of glass to allow for a unique living space in the loft and beautiful natural lighting in the great room. To directly reference traditional Roman orders, I used monolithic columns on the portico, but again subverted it by using black marble, something untraditional to ancient Rome. To take this idea to the next level, omitted almost all aspects of Roman orders, including the capital, base, and entablature to provide a more minimalist aesthetic that is free of ornament. The exterior of the home is constructed of black painted stainless steel, juxtaposing it with the marble cladding of ancient Rome and Renaissance architecture, again using traditional Roman form with modern material functionality.

The fundamental idea of this home was to combine modern materials and aspects of modern functionality into a more classicist design. I found myself interested in the irony of this home, as modern architecture was in a way in direct opposition to classism. The challenge was to create a home that is both classicist and modern, styles many would argue are mutually exclusive. Prof. Lewis challenged me to design the interior of the building first and to avoid trying to cram a floorplan into a predetermined exterior, but in avoiding this, I actually found the home to become more interesting. By clinging to the idea of having a dome, I was forced to think about how I could use the upper floor, leading to my favorite idea for the whole home in the semicircular domed loft. Like all great architects, limitations forced me to become creative and create novel solutions to functional problems. While my home is largely in the form of a Roman temple, something less than ideal for living, it actually is quite suited for a home as it has all of the necessities that one could need for a small vacation home. While this design is far from the most daring, I would argue that it encompasses many of the ideas that we have gone over in class as crucial to the inception of modern architecture and applies them in a different direction than seen before.

Exhibit 1

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 2

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 4

https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-a-pendentive-dome-177310

What is a pendentive dome?

What is a pendentive dome?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 5

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hagia_Sophia

Hagia Sophia

Hagia Sophia

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seagram_Building

Seagram Building

Seagram Building

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit 7

https://www.johndesmond.com/blog/design/mies-van-der-rohe-part-ii-the-mind-behind-the-steel/

 

Bug Off! (Part 2)

Image

The Journey of the Beetle Device Project

First Complete Print of Beetle Device

First Complete Print of Beetle Device

At the heart of Williams College lies the vibrant Community Garden, a space teeming with life. However, like any thriving garden, it faces its share of challenges. Among the most persistent is the Japanese beetle, notorious for its appetite for raspberry bushes, which poses a significant threat to the garden’s yield. Enter the Beetle Device Project, a collaborative initiative with the Zilkha Center for Environmental Initiatives, aimed at developing a sustainable, non-toxic solution to mitigate beetle damage.

From Concept to Creation: Addressing Material Challenges

Last spring, the project was conceptualized with the goal of designing a device to safely repel Japanese beetles. The initial team implemented the first iteration of a 3D printed model, but the primary challenge lay in identifying the right material for production. Standard filaments like PLA proved unsuitable due to their porous nature and limited durability in outdoor conditions. With the acquisition of a BOFA air filter and protective enclosures for the 3D printers, the team unlocked the potential of printing with ASA filament—a robust, nonporous material ideally suited for the task.

The Science Behind ASA and Its Potential

ASA (Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate) filament is a game-changer in 3D printing. Its unique properties make ASA an exceptional material for projects requiring durability: its resistance to UV light, moisture, and heat ensures that the Beetle Device can withstand outdoor elements. Understanding the science behind ASA has reinforced its suitability for this project and opened new possibilities for future initiatives involving durable, nonporous materials. 

Overcoming Technical Hurdles

Because this is the Makerspace’s first time working with ASA, the following challenges had to be addressed:

  • Warping: A number of our initial prints warped, rendering them useless.
  • Lack of adhesion: Despite high printing bed temperatures, the filament often failed to stick to the printing plate.
  • Thermal anomaly and runaway: For two weeks, our prints failed at the midway point due to the print bed temperature deviating significantly from the initial setup. For our Prusa MK3S printers, the thermal anomaly resulted in the print halting, and failing.

Each challenge provided an opportunity for growth. The trial-and-error phase deepened my understanding of how environmental factors influence material performance and how to adapt designs to material limitations. Working with ASA required patience, precision, and a willingness to learn—qualities that have honed my technical skills and broadened my perspective on sustainable design.

Relocated BOFA Filter Nozzle

Relocated BOFA Filter Nozzle

One of the most rewarding moments in the process was the successful printing of the first beetle device trap body. The print, which took approximately ten hours to complete, followed the relocation of the BOFA filter nozzles away from the printing bed in an effort to resolve the thermal anomaly issue. The BOFA filter nozzle had previously been blowing air directly at the printing bed, unintentionally lowering its temperature to the point where the base layers could not stick and causing a thermal anomaly, as the printer struggled to understand why the bed temperature kept dropping during the printing process. Monitoring the print closely during its initial stages and repeatedly checking its progress in the Makerspace was both stressful and immensely satisfying.

Aligning with the Mission of Sustainability

This project aligns seamlessly with the Zilkha Center’s mission to promote sustainability. By employing a safe, eco-conscious approach (i.e. diffusing peppermint essential oils) to pest control, the Beetle Device reduces reliance on harmful chemicals, preserving biodiversity and fostering a healthier environment. It serves as a model for innovative solutions that balance human needs with environmental stewardship.

Impact on the Williams College Community

The Beetle Device has the potential to transform the Williams College Community Garden, safeguarding its raspberry bushes and ensuring a bountiful harvest. Beyond its immediate impact, this project exemplifies how technology and sustainability can converge to address complex challenges. It also lays the groundwork for future explorations in eco-friendly design and material science.

Lessons Learned and Future Directions

With the first successful model of the Beetle Device printed last December, the next steps involve printing three additional devices and installing them this spring, just in time for the upcoming raspberry season. As we move forward, the journey with ASA filament continues to inspire creativity and resilience, paving the way for even more ambitious projects in sustainable innovation.

What’s New

A total of four Beetle Devices are printed and ready to be employed by the Williams College Community Garden for this upcoming raspberry season in June.

All Four Beetle Devices Ready to Go

Check out Part 1 of the Bug Off! project here: E4 Bug Off Team Project : Mitigating Japanese Beetle Damage

 

Reviving an Ancient Way of Printing

What is this Block?

Tibetan printing block 3D printed using PLA filament

Tibetan printing block 3D printed using PLA filament

The Tibetan wooden printing block at the heart of this project is a rare artifact estimated to be 100-200 years old, historically used to create prayer flags. Printing blocks represent one of the most significant innovations of the Tang (618–906) and Song (960–1279) dynasties, revolutionizing knowledge-sharing by enabling the mass publication of texts and enhancing literacy (Asian Art Museum, n.d.).

This block was part of a large group of printing blocks that was acquired at auction from the estate of Philip Gould, who was a professor of Art History at Sarah Lawrence before his retirement in 1993. The existing information about the block is based on comparative research and conversations with faculty colleagues who have expertise in the history of the book in the Himalayas. Professor Xiaotian Yin, an art historian specializing in the art of Inner Asia and China wrote:

“The motif at the center visualizes the seed syllable of the Kalachakra system in Tibetan Buddhism, surrounded by the Tibetan transliteration of a Sanskrit Mantra.” The four mystical animals—Lion (seng), Tiger (stag), Garuda (khung), and Dragon (’brug)—adorn its corners, reaffirming the block’s spiritual significance.”

Why is it Substantive to Replicate this Block?

These historical artifacts are too delicate to use in practical demonstrations. Anne Peale, the Chapin Librarian for the Sawyer Special Collections, would like to create replica of the printing blocks to demonstrate how these would be used. A replica would allow the library to safely make many prints, using a variety of print materials, without worrying about damaging the original blocks.

Anne Peale is also the professor of ASIA 325: The Arts of the Book in Asia for Spring 2025. I asked her about the importance of replicating the printing block and she responded:

“Printing blocks carry the history of how they’ve been used in the ink traces on their surface. Moreover, some blocks become damaged or fragile over time, and we need to ensure that the blocks remain available for future generations of Williams students.”

There are a few features of the printing block that must be preserved. Preservation is a meticulous process, prioritizing the smoothness of the printable surface, the clarity of the text, and the precision of the carved motifs.

3D Scanning with CR-Scan Raptor

The CR-Scan Raptor is a 3D scanner with metrology-grade accuracy, with a maximum accuracy of 0.02mm. Using a blue parallel 7-line laser and a 2.3-megapixel high-resolution camera for scanning, it produces rich details, sharp edges, and restores the 3D shape of the object accurately (Creality, 2024).

Scan Configuration

  • Scanning Mode: Blue Light
  • Resolution: 0.1
  • Color Mapping: No
  • Turntable: No

Recommended System Operation

Windows

  • Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
  • i7-Gen7 CPU, Nvidia graphics card (6GB VRAM)
  • 16GB RAM or higher

MacOS

  • 7.7 and above (Big Sur/Monterey/Ventura)
  • Apple M1/M2/M3 series processors
  • 16GB RAM or higher
Tibetan printing block preparing to be 3D scanned.

Tibetan printing block preparing to be 3D scanned.

Step 1: Set-up the Printing Block to be Scanned

The printing block was placed on top of a scanning pad. I then arbitrarily surrounded with Creality’s reflective circular markers. These marker points were crucial in assisting the scanning process. The more markers, the better.

 

 

 

3D scan of the printing block in creality.

3D scan of the printing block in creality.

Step 2: Scan the Printing Block

I connected the CR-Scan Raptor USB cable to our relatively powerful desktop computer. Then, I started slowly scanning the printing block. During the scanning process, Creality Scan provides a colormap that indicates its confidence in the point clouds it is creating for the whether the current scan quality: red indicates a relatively poor quality of scanning, while an object that appears uniformly green, indicates a relatively good quality scan.

 

Optimized 3D scan of printing block.

Optimized 3D scan of printing block.

Step 3: Optimize the 3D Scanned Model  

After scanning the object, I initiated an optimization of the pointcloud. The smaller the point distance, the better the detail, but it requires more processing time and RAM.

 

 

Printing with Resin

Williams College 3D printed Tibetan printing block using resin.

Williams College 3D printed Tibetan printing block using resin.

The dimensions of the actual Tibetan printing block are as follows:

  • Length: 134.66mm
  • Width: 153.48mm
  • Height: 4.24mm

We coordinated with the Science Center to print the 3D scanned block with resin. Resin 3D printing has the advantage of producing higher resolution and finer details compared to 3D printing with the use of filaments. The printing process was handled by Jason Mativi, Senior Science Center Shop Engineer. Resin is expensive, and to reduce material costs we intentionally printed a very thin object — essentially just the raised print characters with maybe ⅛” backing — and then glued two pieces of custom cut ¼” acrylic plastic to create a rigid backing and protect the resin print.

Why It Matters: Preserving the Past for the Future

In today’s world, ancient artifacts face constant risks of damage or loss. Projects like this show how technology can help preserve cultural treasures while keeping them accessible. By using 3D scanning and resin printing, we can create accurate replicas that protect the original artifact while allowing people to engage with its history.

Replicating this Tibetan printing block doesn’t just save its physical form—it keeps its story alive, inspiring and educating future generations about the rich culture and artistry it represents.

Community

Exquisite ancient artistic artifacts like this Tibetan printing block are continuously depleting in terms of numbers. It is hard to maintain these numbers in place because it can only go down and never go up. This is something inevitable as we proceed in time.

“We anticipate using this block to demonstrate woodblock printing processes with ARTH 325: The Arts of the Book in Asia, and also to use it in co-curricular programming, since it is durable and easy to transport. Hands-on printing is a fantastic way of teaching book history to all kinds of learners,” said Professor Peale.

Why It Matters: Balancing Preservation and Accessibility

The replication of this block is more than a technical achievement—it’s a cultural imperative. In an era when ancient artifacts are steadily depleting, projects like this ensure their stories endure. By blending tradition with technology, we not only preserve history but also make it accessible to new generations.

 

Local ChatGPT: A Board Enclosure for Williams’ Micro AI

Imagine tinkering with a Generative AI. The orthodoxical scenario with Generative AI is that you ask it a question and it gives you an answer. But this time, rather than asking a question, you dictate how it answers the question. Instead of being a mere user, you are the brain behind the AI.

What is generative AI?

Printed case (using high-temperature ASA filament)

3D printed case (using high-temperature ASA filament)

A type of AI that quickly generates answers, information, and contents based on the user’s variety of input (Nvidia, 2024). It typically has an interface where users can type their inputs. Generally, these models can have text, images, sounds, animation, 3D models, or other types of data as inputs and outputs. 

At Williams, there exists a local generative AI called EphBot. Unlike the mainstream generative AI (e.g. ChatGPT, Gemini) which connect you to a huge database stored in powerful servers, EphBot is a tiny device that can be held in a real person’s hand. The EphBot offers AI for experimentation and exploration while ensuring complete data privacy because it is local and does not interact with the Internet or other databases.

Now what?

The Office for Information Technology (OIT) at Williams College is developing another micro AI just like EphBot. Mr. Gerol Petruzella is an Academic Technology Consultant in OIT and the project developer of the upcoming micro AI called NanoBot. I asked him about the purpose and significance of the project and he responded with, 

“For students and faculty at Williams to explore and experiment critically with generative AI. I believe passionately that all Williams students should have the opportunity to be more than merely users of generative AI applications.”

The NanoBot project is the 2nd anticipated microAI of Williams College. It is a generative AI like ChatGPT and Gemini. However, instead of being just a user, NanoBot gives you the opportunity to experiment on the AI itself.  

Why is it necessary to create a casing for the microAI?

Before I go deeper into that question, let us scrutinize the story from the start. Gerol is+ using the NVIDIA Jetson Nano Developer Kit to create the NanoBot. It is a small AI computer that allows a user to build practical AI applications, cool AI robots, and more. 

“I reached out to the Makerspace because the Jetson Nano Developer Kit provides a bare board, but no case or enclosure,” said Mr. Petruzella.

He noted that the Jetson Nano Developer Kit, which is the NanoBot itself, lacks a protective enclosure to its main body. This would be bad especially for hardware like this that is intended to be presented and used by a variety of people on loan through the Williams Library.

“Since my goal is to develop units which students and others in the Williams community can check out and use, the device needed a case, to make it sturdy and usable (avoiding both damage to the device and harm to the user!)”

Indeed, a protective cover would make the device itself sturdy and also avoid the risk of harming the people that are going to use it. But from what types of harm would the enclosure offer protection specifically?

Physical Protection

If the NanoBot will be used by the public, we cannot deny the fact that accidental bumps, drops, and other physical impacts that could lead to damage are likely to happen. Not to mention dust, dirt, and other particles that can accumulate on internal components and cause malfunctions.

Thermal Management

The enclosure is designed to have ventilation in order to help dissipate heat generated by the hardware, preventing overheating and ensuring optimal performance. By controlling the internal environment, it can help maintain a stable operating temperature for sensitive components.

Electrical Safety

It may be a small device, but it is still powered by electricity. The enclosure can provide electrical insulation, protecting users from accidental contact with live components and reducing the risk of electric shock. The enclosure would serve as the countermeasure and we know that it is better to have a countermeasure than to have a cure for electric related damages. 

You can read more here about enclosures.

Why not just order one online?

“I couldn’t find any commercially-available case for this model, but I did discover a recipe on Thingiverse, so using the resources of the Williams Makerspace seemed like a great solution,” said Mr. Petruzella.

The main objective of this project was to fabricate a cost-effective enclosure for the Jetson Nano Board. Specifically, this project aimed to create an enclosure that can:

  1. Protect the device from physical impacts
  2. Withstand high thermal activities without melting
  3. Serve as an outer insulation for the device 

Printing with ASA Filament

Filament Type: PolyLite ASA

Specification:

  • Print Temperature: 240 – 260 °C
  • Print Speed: 30 – 50 mm/s
  • Bed Temperature: 75 – 95 °C
  • Fan: OFF

Caution

The fumes emitted by the ASA filament can be potentially dangerous when inhaled. It emits a smelly & intense smoke that comes from Styrene present in this plastic compound (MakeShaper, 2020). This fume can cause health issues such as headaches, irritation, and so much more. It is recommended to use a fume extraction system while printing. We used BOFA fume extractors.

Blueprint of the top enclosure in Prusa Slicer Software.

Blueprint of the top enclosure in Prusa Slicer Software.

Step 1: Acquire the 3D Model of the Enclosure
The 3D model was pre-modeled by Ecoiras in thingiverse. I downloaded and converted it into a file that the Prusa i3 (3D Printer) can read using Prusa Slicer software. You are always welcome to customize your own design.

The Prusa i3 (3D Printer) printing the enclosure.

The Prusa i3 (3D Printer) printing the enclosure.

 

 

 

Step 2: Configure the 3D Printer and Load the Assigned Filament
Then, wait for it to print. It may fail to print sometimes, but it is totally normal for it to fail. Print and print until it succeeds. After it successfully prints the product, slowly scrape it off from the plate from which it was printed.

The NanoBot with its new enclosure.

The NanoBot with its new enclosure.

 

 

 

Step 3: Fit the Finished Product.
This is the finished product. Feel free to change the color if you want. We chose to print this case in ASA filament, instead of the more common PLA filament, because ASA offers a melting temperature that is higher by about 50 degrees Celsius. That means that the heat generated by generative AI computing is less likely to melt the case. 

Community

In this technology-driven time, the generative AI’s performance and popularity continuously rise. It is inevitable as we proceed in times where advancing technology is prominent. NanoBot will empower students and faculty to become active participants rather than passive consumers of generative AI technology.

The NanoBot gives users the ability to transcend the state of being mere users—how do you want to configure AI?

Resources

Nvidia. “What Is Generative AI?” NVIDIA, 2024, https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/glossary/generative-ai/  

MakeShaper (2020). 3D Printing: Understanding more about ASA filament applications. Makeshaper. https://www.makeshaper.com/post/3d-printing-understanding-more-about-asa-filament-applications 

Benchys on Benches and Sailors on Shelves

Using CAD allowed me to model and then print this custom holder for future benchy calibration test prints.

Using CAD allowed me to model and then print this custom holder for future benchy calibration test prints.

The objectives of this project were to 1) build a 3D model and print from scratch to accumulate hands-on CAD and prototyping experience for future modeling and printing projects, and 2) build a practical object—in this case, shelves resting on the windowsill in the Makerspace that can contain and display Benchys—3D boat models used for calibrating and benchmarking 3D-printing performance.

First, I measured the width of the windowsill (1.5”) and dimensions of a typical 3D Benchy (2.5” x 1.25” x 2.0”). Using those measurements, I used the outline and sketch features in the Fusion 360 software to create a shelf exactly 1.5” wide that would sit flush on our windowsill.

The dimensions of the compartment needed to be slightly larger than the dimensions of the Benchy to allow for movement. So, I sketched a rectangle surrounding the perimeters of the Benchy with an additional .25” of room for the width and height to allow for “tolerance” in the geometric dimensioning. I used the “mirror” action in Fusion360 to duplicate the compartments, totaling 4×4 or 16 shelves.

I sketched a blue rectangle with the same length and height as the Benchy: 2.5” x 2.0”. This served as a helpful tolerancing reference.

I sketched a blue rectangle with the same length and height as the Benchy: 2.5” x 2.0”. This served as a helpful tolerancing reference.

I used the “extrude” feature in Fusion 360 to add a width of 1.5” to the original 2-dimensional sketch, thereby transforming it into a 3D model.

I used the “extrude” feature in Fusion 360 to add a width of 1.5” to the original 2-dimensional sketch, thereby transforming it into a 3D model.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Upon completing the 3D model and initializing the 3D printing process, I discovered that the model’s width and height exceeded the dimensions of the standard Prusa 1 MK3S bed. To solve this problem, I could have undergone another remodeling process to fit the dimensions or sliced the prototype and printed it in four iterations. Instead, I printed the original prototype on the larger Prusa XL. Looking forward to future projects, I’ll carefully consider the geometric dimensions of my 3D models relative to the volumetric constraints of the 3D printing devices to ensure successful prints.

Special thanks to Stepher Sabio (’28) and David Keiser-Clark, Makerspace Program Manager, for assisting in the 3D printing process!

Post Script

One year later, my custom storage shelf is happily filled with calibration test prints by our student workers.

One year later, my custom storage shelf is happily filled with calibration test prints by our student workers.

One year later, my custom storage shelf is happily filled with calibration test prints by our student workers.