Building a Mirrorhaploscope: When Psychology Meets the Makerspace

Introduction

An early iteration of the Mirrorhaploscope. before additional horizontal tracks were added for increased maneuverability.

An early iteration of the Mirrorhaploscope. before additional horizontal tracks were added for increased maneuverability.

Most people think vision is simple. You open your eyes and see. The new mirrorhaploscope in Assistant Professor Kim Wong’s lab proves it is much more complicated. This past fall, Professor Wong reached out to the Williams Makerspace with a request that would merge research, design, and hands-on building: a mirrorhaploscope for studying how the brain chooses what we see. The device will be used in both PSYC 300 (Perception) and the WAVE Lab (Wong Attention, Vision, and Encoding Lab), supporting studies of visual awareness, attention, and binocular rivalry. The collaboration made it possible for students to help construct a fully functional research instrument that they will later use in their own experiments.

The Problem or Research Purpose

A mirrorhaploscope is a deceptively simple optical instrument with powerful implications. It allows researchers to present different images to each eye at the same time—allowing us to push our visual system to its limits, and test unconscious, automatic processing. With this setup, Professor Wong can run Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) experiments, a method that consists of overwhelming one eye with a chaotic, rapidly flashing pattern (aka a “dynamic Mondrian mask”),  while the other sees a stable image. This flashing is so overwhelming to the visual system that it completely dominates awareness, and the brain temporarily “suppresses” the stable image. Experimenters then measure the amount of time it takes for the stable image to finally “break through” the suppression from the flashing pattern.

In plain terms? The device lets researchers peek into how attention and perception works while the participant themselves has no idea that there is even another image present at all.  This allows them to ask the critical question: “What does your visual system do automatically, before you’re even conscious of it?” They can thus experimentally manipulate: 

  • What kinds of images capture visual awareness first (i.e. which images “break through” the suppression faster)?
  • What kinds of stimuli or scenes are unconsciously prioritized by the visual system?
  • How does the brain resolve conflicting visual input?
  • Why do we notice some things instantly while completely missing others?
  • Do we find major differences across individuals’ visual processing?  

And all of this comes from four mirrors angled just right.

The Build

The build started with a brainstorming meeting mid September. Professor Wong explained the necessary features: tilt-adjustable mirrors, a full height-adjustment track so the device could fit all necessary setups, and a touch of aesthetics. That became our blueprint. 

A 3D sketch of the mirrorhaploscope before diving into tangible build

A 3D sketch of the mirrorhaploscope before diving into tangible build

From there, the making process unfolded like a narrative. First came the wooden frame for mirror mounts, then choosing hardware that allowed fine-tuned rotation, and testing a series of height adjustments designs. Decisions about height adjustability required a universal T-track system, while the mirror tilt demanded ball-and-socket mounts with tightening knobs. 

A cardboard prototype to help visualize the mirrorhaploscope

A cardboard prototype to help visualize the mirrorhaploscope

Along the way, the build team had plenty of human moments: 

  • Attaching the mirrors came with a number of attempts, including failure to account for how quickly the glue solidified, and coordination between team members became essential.
  • During one clean up session, the force of the vacuum was not accounted for and a wooden piece made its way down the pipe. Disassembling the vacuum was required to retrieve the piece. 
  • The team was so focused on protecting the first set of mirrors from getting scratched that it was not until final assembly that we realized the mirrors were in fact distorted and new ones must be ordered.

By early November, after careful alignment and many hours in the woodshop, the mirrorhaploscope finally took shape.

Mirrorhaploscope finished product, photo taken in the Makerspace

Mirrorhaploscope finished product, photo taken in the Makerspace

The Final Product

The finished mirrorhaploscope is clean, sturdy, and deceptively elegant. 

It features: 

  • Four angled mirrors arranged to separate left-eye and right-eye images 
  • Adjustable mirror mounts using ball-and-socket heads for precise tilting 
  • Two independent height and width adjustable track systems to accommodate different setups and users 

It can sit on a standard 30-inch table, with the mirror heights adjustable to match Professor Wong’s required visual angles. It is mobile enough to be deployed in both the PSYC 300 classroom and the WAVE Lab, where it will support experiments for years to come. 

When the team handed it to Professor Wong, the feeling was unanimous: proud, relieved, and a little in awe that a pile of wood, mirrors, and hardware had become a fully functional research tool.

Mirrorhaploscope finished product, photo taken in the WAVE Lab

Mirrorhaploscope finished product, photo taken in the WAVE Lab

WAVE Lab Research Assistant Maggie Nichols demonstrating how the mirrorhaploscope is used in experiment setting

WAVE Lab Research Assistant Maggie Nichols demonstrating how the mirrorhaploscope is used in experiment setting

Why This Project Matters

This project represents something bigger than a Makerspace build. We didn’t just learn about visual perception, we helped create the instrument that will produce new scientific knowledge. The Makerspace enabled academic experimentation, allowing psychology, engineering, and creativity to intersect in a single device. 

And now, PSYC 300 students will do something rare in an undergraduate course: use a professional research device they helped design and build. The mirrorhaploscope is more than a tool; it’s proof that hands-on learning can quite literally change how we see. This project didn’t just teach us about perception. It taught us that learning accelerates when students build the tools that drive discovery.

Bug Off! (Part 2)

Image

The Journey of the Beetle Device Project

First Complete Print of Beetle Device

First Complete Print of Beetle Device

At the heart of Williams College lies the vibrant Community Garden, a space teeming with life. However, like any thriving garden, it faces its share of challenges. Among the most persistent is the Japanese beetle, notorious for its appetite for raspberry bushes, which poses a significant threat to the garden’s yield. Enter the Beetle Device Project, a collaborative initiative with the Zilkha Center for Environmental Initiatives, aimed at developing a sustainable, non-toxic solution to mitigate beetle damage.

From Concept to Creation: Addressing Material Challenges

Last spring, the project was conceptualized with the goal of designing a device to safely repel Japanese beetles. The initial team implemented the first iteration of a 3D printed model, but the primary challenge lay in identifying the right material for production. Standard filaments like PLA proved unsuitable due to their porous nature and limited durability in outdoor conditions. With the acquisition of a BOFA air filter and protective enclosures for the 3D printers, the team unlocked the potential of printing with ASA filament—a robust, nonporous material ideally suited for the task.

The Science Behind ASA and Its Potential

ASA (Acrylonitrile Styrene Acrylate) filament is a game-changer in 3D printing. Its unique properties make ASA an exceptional material for projects requiring durability: its resistance to UV light, moisture, and heat ensures that the Beetle Device can withstand outdoor elements. Understanding the science behind ASA has reinforced its suitability for this project and opened new possibilities for future initiatives involving durable, nonporous materials. 

Overcoming Technical Hurdles

Because this is the Makerspace’s first time working with ASA, the following challenges had to be addressed:

  • Warping: A number of our initial prints warped, rendering them useless.
  • Lack of adhesion: Despite high printing bed temperatures, the filament often failed to stick to the printing plate.
  • Thermal anomaly and runaway: For two weeks, our prints failed at the midway point due to the print bed temperature deviating significantly from the initial setup. For our Prusa MK3S printers, the thermal anomaly resulted in the print halting, and failing.

Each challenge provided an opportunity for growth. The trial-and-error phase deepened my understanding of how environmental factors influence material performance and how to adapt designs to material limitations. Working with ASA required patience, precision, and a willingness to learn—qualities that have honed my technical skills and broadened my perspective on sustainable design.

Relocated BOFA Filter Nozzle

Relocated BOFA Filter Nozzle

One of the most rewarding moments in the process was the successful printing of the first beetle device trap body. The print, which took approximately ten hours to complete, followed the relocation of the BOFA filter nozzles away from the printing bed in an effort to resolve the thermal anomaly issue. The BOFA filter nozzle had previously been blowing air directly at the printing bed, unintentionally lowering its temperature to the point where the base layers could not stick and causing a thermal anomaly, as the printer struggled to understand why the bed temperature kept dropping during the printing process. Monitoring the print closely during its initial stages and repeatedly checking its progress in the Makerspace was both stressful and immensely satisfying.

Aligning with the Mission of Sustainability

This project aligns seamlessly with the Zilkha Center’s mission to promote sustainability. By employing a safe, eco-conscious approach (i.e. diffusing peppermint essential oils) to pest control, the Beetle Device reduces reliance on harmful chemicals, preserving biodiversity and fostering a healthier environment. It serves as a model for innovative solutions that balance human needs with environmental stewardship.

Impact on the Williams College Community

The Beetle Device has the potential to transform the Williams College Community Garden, safeguarding its raspberry bushes and ensuring a bountiful harvest. Beyond its immediate impact, this project exemplifies how technology and sustainability can converge to address complex challenges. It also lays the groundwork for future explorations in eco-friendly design and material science.

Lessons Learned and Future Directions

With the first successful model of the Beetle Device printed last December, the next steps involve printing three additional devices and installing them this spring, just in time for the upcoming raspberry season. As we move forward, the journey with ASA filament continues to inspire creativity and resilience, paving the way for even more ambitious projects in sustainable innovation.

What’s New

A total of four Beetle Devices are printed and ready to be employed by the Williams College Community Garden for this upcoming raspberry season in June.

All Four Beetle Devices Ready to Go

Check out Part 1 of the Bug Off! project here: E4 Bug Off Team Project : Mitigating Japanese Beetle Damage