A lot of small things we can do (COVID-19)

What are our responsibilities, as young people, in the context of the coronavirus?

  • behave as if it matters if you get it
    • “be one of the hive”
    • as if it could kill you
    • as if it could affect others for you to get it
  • grocery shop for elderly neighbors
  • donate money to those who aren’t working and losing salaries
    • how effective?
  • stay informed
    • know it’s worse than the flu
    • for talking with people who don’t take it seriously
    • “if you hold your breath for ten seconds, you don’t have it”
    • “hydrate or diedrate”
  • minimize speculation
  • when hanging with friends
    • go for walks, outside
  • acknowledge drinking makes it more likely to get sick
  • check in with family, friends
    • grandparents esp.
  • scare people who need it, boost morale of those who need it

Celebrity Death

 

We’re kicking off this Thursday (2/20) by discussing how we should speak about the passing of people who’ve been controversial in life — specifically by thinking about Kobe Bryant’s recent passing and subsequent legacy. How do we tell someone’s story in full, and is it appropriate to tell the bad parts after they’ve passed? How can one person mean so many different things to different people? How do we acknowledge those who grew up with Kobe as a model of sportsmanship while also acknowledging the sexual assault suit? Can we acknowledge both, or does it have to be one or the other?

Campus Athletic Recruitment: Conversation led by ThinkerAnalytix

On Friday (1/24) at 7:30pm in Schapiro 129, we will be hosting a conversation about university athletic recruitment. It will be motivated by recent conversation via OpEds in The Record (see below) and moderated by representatives from ThinkerAnalytix, who will use argument mapping as a way of sorting through different perspectives on the matter. (Calendar Link) (Facebook Event).

Sponsored by the Class of ’71 Public Affairs Forum.

Why we revived The Forum

(Also published in The Williams Record.)

Williams can be a deeply warm place. Its pockets of warmth arise when students get together — practicing with a sports team, escaping the icy air to gather with friends in Paresky, participating in a seminar. When we connect with each other in the midst of frosty weather, our removed location and the barrage of midterms, Williams’ community is strongest.

Last year, when it came to national politics, Williams students weren’t really connecting with each other. While a courageous portion of Williams students were vocal, many were hesitant to discuss politics with people other than close friends (maybe stemming from past disagreement on campus issues that was neither healthy nor based in trust). Without a campus-wide culture of open conversation, it was difficult to find a sense of community around national politics, or to even just stay up to date.

The Williams Forum was founded three years ago with the goal of increasing political activity on campus. In its first couple of years, the Forum made some progress on this front, inviting speakers and hosting debates. Last year, the club was less active, only co-sponsoring a few guest speakers.

This year, we revived the Forum with a new vision: to create a space where students can dig into national politics with each other. Every Friday at 7:30pm in the Mabie Room in Sawyer, we pick an issue and sift through it, determining where and why our perspectives overlap and diverge. Our conversations have ranged from the format of the presidential debates to impeachment proceedings, privacy and Big Tech and political conspiracies.

The Mabie conversations follow three simple principles. First, all participation must be motivated by appreciation for all kinds of people. Second, anyone who brings in new information must first explain it so that others can use it too. Third, we ask that people speak up when they are unfamiliar with something referenced (e.g., a term, a phrase, a political figure). We hope our conversations demonstrate the beauty of open engagement and the ability of these three principles to produce it.

While the Mabie conversations are important to our political engagement with each other and with national politics, they are only the beginning. For students to take ownership over their politics, we have to improve the way we invite political speakers to campus. One often goes to a speaker event if she’s seen it in a Daily Message or heard about it from a professor and thinks she’ll be entertained enough to sit and listen for an hour. Afterward — inspired, upset or anywhere in between — she might share her reaction with a friend, then move on.

We believe speaker events should channel student interest. After our Mabie conversations, we identify perspectives that were missing and invite those perspectives into our space. Sometimes that means we include new students, faculty or staff. Sometimes, it means that we invite political figures or thinkers from outside the Williams community. Either way, we envision a town-hall dynamic, driven by student interest, that erodes the distinction between audience and speaker. Multiple events are being organized for the spring.

We want the trust and open discussion that exists in Mabie to be the norm. On Williams campus, it’s a huge project, and we have a long way to go. But insofar as students here care about our college and national communities, deep political engagement at Williams remains urgent and feasible.

We’d love for you to join us.

__

The Williams Forum Board

Projecting the Democratic Debate!

Join us at 9pm on Nov. 20 as we project the Democratic Presidential Debate in Baxter Hall! There’ll be pizza and dessert. We’re putting together this watch party in collaboration with EphVotes, Womxn in Politics, The Williams Democrats, and The Society For Conservative Thought.

All students, faculty, and staff are welcome!