Log-Sobolev Inequality
My 2009 Williams College NSF “SMALL” undergraduate research Geometry Group has the following inequality for any function on the unit interval and for any p ≥ 1:
with equality for constant functions and if p>1 only for constant functions. They conjecture that these results still hold if on the right-hand side is replaced by (sharp).
The case p=1 is standard and follows from Wirtinger’s Inequality.
Are any inequalities like this known?
LJS:
Isn’t the LHS decreasing in p, so p=1 is worst case?
This does not of course help with the conjecture.
Right you are, thanks very much. The undergraduates came upon it in a completely different way, as a generalization of the isoperimetric inequality (p=1) to sectors of planes with density , using the four vertex theorem. Your comment inspired a simpler geometric comparison argument. Do you believe the conjecture?—FM
11 June 2009, 2:36 pmFrank Morgan:
Comment from David Thompson, SMALL undergraduate research Geometry Group ’09
The conjectured inequality says that for all ,
.
The case holds trivially; is the standard isoperimetric inequality. Both sides are concave as functions of . Would some kind of interpolation argument prove the result for all ?
14 June 2009, 10:04 amFrank Morgan:
Francesco Maggi at Firenze notes that differentiating with respect to q at q=1 implies the following log-Sobolev inequality for uniform measure on the interval for a nonnegative function f of mean 1:
Corollary of Conjecture: .
Similarly the corollary, on small perturbations of f = 1, implies the sharp, known Wirtinger inequality:
9 June 2010, 3:29 amfor (nonperiodic) u of mean 0. (For u periodic the sharp constant is .)
Frank Morgan:
My 2012 undergraduate research Geometry Group has observed that the sharp log-Sobolev inequality on the interval follows immediately from a similar inequality on the circle.
30 August 2012, 5:17 amFrank Morgan » Blog Archive » Manifolds with Density: Fuller References:
[…] [2012] Alexander Díaz, Nate Harman, Sean Howe, David Thompson, Isoperimetric problems in sectors with density, Adv. Geom. 12 (2012), 589–619; arXiv.org (2010); see blog posts 1 and 2. […]
17 October 2014, 9:16 am