“Please Vote for Me” was definitely an example of democracy, although not in its purest forms. Its key elements – an election, direct voting, multiple candidates – make it qualify as democracy in action. However, it was certainly “tinged” in many ways. For one, the candidates were not chosen by a prior vote, but instead were chosen by the teacher. These students seemed excited about the idea, but may not have volunteered under their own volition. In this way, it was not democracy in its purest form. Additionally, a further critique is that a majority was not required. In many democratic systems with more than two candidates, the winner needs a majority in order to win. For this election to have been more “pure” in terms of democracy, it would have required a majority to win and might have incurred a second vote in order to achieve this.
The election was easily tampered with. This occurs in many true states with real elections, but maybe not with this degree of separation. In this election, the candidates, namely the largest boy whose name escapes me, were able to directly influence their votes through shady tactics. Again, this often occurs in real life, a la Egypt, Russia, etc.
Lastly, as is also the case in many true states, there was no oversight to prevent such shady practices from going on. Our current president’s administration is seeing this dynamic play out in front of them – they potentially acted “shadily” and are being investigated for it. In a “purer system,” the intimidation and manipulation that occurred could have prevented the aforementioned boy from even being considered in the final vote.
This article is exceptional, thank you so much for sharing. Free C-C4H620-34 new study guide ppt test materials are available! Good luck!
Your article was a breath of fresh air, thank you for sharing it. The Latest test cram 1V0-41.20 sheet questions were a key part of my success—promotion and salary raise—and today, I’m sharing them for free!
I’m so grateful for the inspiration in this article, thank you! With New Okta-Certified-Developer visual cert test, you’ll find rich content, and it’s offered free of charge to help you.
This article is deep, and I’ve learned many valuable experiences from it. Free 2V0-41.24 valid test cram pdf exam questions—best of luck to all exam candidates!
CWBSP学習資料の内容はすべて、NFPA長年にわたる試験の概要と業界の発展動向に基づいて、ShikenPASS業界の専門家によって編集されています。 CWBSP試験ガイドは、単なるテスト問題のパッチワークではなく、独自のシステムと階層レベルを備えているため、ユーザーは効果的に改善できます。 CWBSP学習資料には、さまざまな被験者の特性と範囲に応じて試験の専門家が作成したテストペーパーが含まれています。 また、CWBSP試験の質問で勉強すると、Certified Water-Based Systems Professionals試験に合格することになります。
I definitely agree that the elections depicted definitely contain elements of democracy, but it was “tinged,” as you say, and the elections failed to achieve what the teacher intended them to. I found it really surprising how quickly the children turned to bribing and booing/finding faults in the other candidates running for class monitor rather than promoting their own strengths. Is this is simply human nature, we might wonder, or does it have more to do with the society in which the documentary takes place?