“The Grocer and the Chief” Post

Daniel Lerner’s “The Grocer and the Chief” equates History with change. Before the election of 1950, the village of Balgat is essentially static. People have set, comfortable social positions and traditional values govern the way they live their lives. The state of society is not called into question, despite the sharp discrepancy in technological development between the village and the city of Ankara, not far away. The Chief of the village is a prime example of Balgat’s “pre-Historic” way of life. He is comfortable with maintaining the status quo. Perhaps the first Historical figure in Balgat’s narrative is the grocer, who alters the social equilibrium by openly stating his desire to live with more material wealth and technology, and seeking to belong to a society that mirrors American capitalism. Even though the grocer’s views are frowned upon by his fellow villagers, they serve as a precursor to the changes to come. Four years later, the grocer’s vision is viewed through a more “modern” historical lens. “He was the cleverest of us all…he was a prophet.” In the case of Balgat, change leads to the development of history, which ultimately shapes the concept of modernity. Modernity is exemplified through material wealth and more social mobility. Meanwhile, Balgat is integrated into the city of Ankara, and citizens lose many of their traditional values and economic independence. Overall, the anomaly of the grocer in Balgat foreshadows the rapid social and economic change that will shape the modern historical narrative of the small Turkish village.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.