The Process of Modernization

In “The Passing of Traditional Society,” Lerner examines the process of modernization. He writes of Tosun’s account of the Chief and the Grocer to juxtapose the dichotomy between “the traditional Turkish values” and the new modern, national and global values of “an expansive world” (Lerner 23). The Chief is solely focused on the local issues about “women and cows” surrounding his town of Balgat. His ancestral heritage supports his authority, and the townspeople respect him and those traditional values of “obedience, courage, loyalty” that he represents. In contrast, the Grocer wants to “get out of his hole” and preferably move to a city for a more urbane life. His authority is based on his necessity as the only merchant in town who understands how the markets in Ankara work. The Grocer is focused on the larger national and global issues of  “a different world, an expansive world, populated more actively with imaginings and fantasies” (23). The one point of transition between these two worlds symbolized by the Chief and the Grocer is the use of the media, and, in particular, the radio. The radio, as a forms of communication, allows the Chief to begin to hear the national and global news, in this way, bringing the modern world into that of the traditional. Fascinatingly, this method of modernization works, as in 4 years, there were “over 100 radio receivers in Balgat” (34). Although the positive or negative outcome of such modernization can be debated (“the ancient village…had passed”), Lerner demonstrates the shift in modernization is due to a change in local to global communication and an interest in the larger world.

1 thought on “The Process of Modernization

  1. I think you may have put it more eloquently than me, but I agree with your assessment. I would just like to build on your comment that it is “fascinating” that this method of modernization worked. In other traditional villages it may be harder to change the minds of the people even if one or two people from the village venture out. Why did it work in this case? I am not certain, but it probably had something to do with the proximity to Ankara and the type of culture in the area. From Lerner’s description, modernity appears to be mutually exclusive from the tradition of the village. Either you are a farmer, or you work in a factory–not both (from a simple point of view). In other areas (Tuscany comes to mind) this may not be the case, and therefore modernization does not necessarily mean the removal or even the overshadowing of tradition.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.