{"id":223,"date":"2020-01-01T21:07:23","date_gmt":"2020-01-02T02:07:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/?p=223"},"modified":"2020-03-22T21:24:13","modified_gmt":"2020-03-23T01:24:13","slug":"microsoft-bandwagon-buy-or-calculated-investment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/fall-2019\/microsoft-bandwagon-buy-or-calculated-investment\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft: Bandwagon Buy, Or Calculated Investment?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By: Shayan Moazeni<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">You are on a random walk down some street (let\u2019s say it\u2019s not Wall Street). You ask a random stranger for stock ideas. Off the top of their head, they will recite the FAANGs &#8212; large household companies like Amazon, Apple, and even Microsoft. At first sight, a stock that the Average Joe recommends is likely not a clever investment. But Microsoft continues to profitably reach for the clouds.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) has had quite a year: its stock is up 46% (YTD) and it has won two government contracts, worth a total of $17.6B over the next ten years, to provide the federal government its dominant hybrid cloud product. Azure, its cloud system, is the competitive advantage that, along with the unique breakdown of Microsoft\u2019s revenue, transforms the company from just a \u201cbandwagon\u201d buy to a calculated investment. I will analyze both of these points in the rest of the article.<\/span><b><br \/>\n<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-226 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.09.32-PM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1250\" height=\"828\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.09.32-PM.png 1250w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.09.32-PM-300x199.png 300w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.09.32-PM-1024x678.png 1024w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.09.32-PM-768x509.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1250px) 100vw, 1250px\" \/><\/b><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_225\" style=\"width: 1728px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-225\" class=\"wp-image-225 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.10.54-PM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1718\" height=\"1062\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.10.54-PM.png 1718w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.10.54-PM-300x185.png 300w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.10.54-PM-1024x633.png 1024w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.10.54-PM-768x475.png 768w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.10.54-PM-1536x949.png 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1718px) 100vw, 1718px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-225\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 1<\/p><\/div>\n<p><b>A Deeper Dive Into The Business<br \/>\n<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Microsoft\u2019s revenues and operating income are both up 21% (YoY) this year, but what makes this growth more impressing than that of, say, Apple, is the structure: while over 52% of Apple\u2019s revenues come from the iPhone, Microsoft\u2019s cash flows stem almost perfectly evenly from three segments: \u201cProductivity and Business Management\u201d, \u201cIntelligent Cloud\u201d, and \u201cMore Personal Computing.\u201d This even distribution of income greatly reduces the risk of revenue loss from a single product, putting the firm in the best position for the long run.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In Productivity and Business Management, revenues are up $1.3B (13%) for the quarter, $807M of which is from Microsoft Office (a 13% increase), and $379M of which is from Microsoft\u2019s new acquisition, LinkedIn (a 25% increase, already proving to be a smart investment). These two platforms have helped the 16% increase in gross margins in the segment, leading to an impressive 23% increase in segment operating income.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In More Personal Computing, revenues are up $387M (4%) for the quarter, lifted by a 9% increase by Windows and 11% increase in search advertising, while gaming revenue is down 7% due to the cyclical nature of the sales of the Xbox (revenues from hardware sales are down because the latest Xbox was released in 2013, but content and services revenues are unchanged). Operating income increased 28% due to a shift to higher margin businesses, among other things.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This brings us to the main focus point of the article, Microsoft Azure, which currently accounts for 32.8% of Microsoft\u2019s revenues. Running on a 36% operating margin, revenues and operating income from Azure are both up 21% (YoY) thanks to the strong hold Microsoft has on the cloud market, with a market share of 17.7% in 2018 and 18.2% in 2019. As mentioned before, Microsoft has also secured two contracts with the federal government for its hybrid cloud system, adding $633.6M to its annual operating income over the next 10 years. The hybrid cloud allows users of Azure with sensitive information to secure most of their information on the cloud system but keep certain bits of the data offline to prevent Microsoft, hackers, and other third-party users from accessing the information. By fixing this issue, Microsoft has opened its cloud system to hundreds of potential clients who may have previously been hesitant to storing their data on Azure.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">An analysis of the market for cloud supports this. As Gartner reports <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">[1]<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, the annual revenue generated from cloud activities across the market is predicated to grow from $214B in 2019 to $331.2 by 2022, a 55% increase.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_224\" style=\"width: 1568px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-224\" class=\"wp-image-224 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.15.07-PM.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1558\" height=\"946\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.15.07-PM.png 1558w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.15.07-PM-300x182.png 300w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.15.07-PM-1024x622.png 1024w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.15.07-PM-768x466.png 768w, https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/files\/2020\/03\/Screen-Shot-2020-03-22-at-9.15.07-PM-1536x933.png 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1558px) 100vw, 1558px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-224\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 2<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Valuation<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the first two segments, not much is expected to change for Microsoft save for the release of the new Xbox in 2020. Since Microsoft\u2019s margins are surprisingly low on the Xbox hardware<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> [2]<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, the release of the new Xbox will not have a significant impact on the net cash flows to the company and gaming EBIT will continue to mostly stem from subscriptions and games, which are not subject to much change. For this valuation, despite the impressive growth in Productivity and Business Management and More Personal Computing segments (average growth of 24% and 23% respectively), I will assign a conservative 20% annual growth to those segments through 2022.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Finally, the cloud business. According to the aforementioned market forecast data, total revenue generated in the cloud business grew 17.5% from $182B in 2018 to $214B in 2019. In the same year, Microsoft\u2019s cloud revenue (and EBIT) grew 21%, asserting its dominance over the cloud market. Due to Microsoft\u2019s strong hold on the market, it is reasonable to expect this trend of beating the cloud market to continue. Below is a numerical summary of figure 2 along with Microsoft\u2019s expected revenue from its (linearly) growing market share as well as Microsoft\u2019s expected EBIT (using it\u2019s consistent 36% operating margin) which also includes the annual $633M income from its two government contracts.<\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Segment\/Year<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">2018<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">2019<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">2020<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">2021<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">2022<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Total Market Revenue<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">182.4<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">214.3<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">249.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">289.1<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">331.2<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">MSFT Market Share\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">17.70%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">18.20%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">18.70%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">19.20%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">19.70%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Microsoft Rev<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">32.23<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">38.99<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">46.7126<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">55.5072<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">65.2464<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">EBIT (with gov contract)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">11.52<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">13.92<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">17.45<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">20.616<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">24.122<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Growth (YoY)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">21%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">25%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">18%<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">17%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Figure 3: all raw values are in billions of dollars<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As the model suggests, Microsoft\u2019s operating income from cloud will double by 2022. Using this value and the expected growth in the other two segments, I predict Microsoft\u2019s future EBIT as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Segment<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Business<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cloud<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Personal Comp<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Total<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">EBIT<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">29.6<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">24.12<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">23.6<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">77.3<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Figure 4: all values are in billions of dollars<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Using the consistent EV\/EBIT ratio of 23 for Microsoft in recent years, this yields the following values for enterprise value. With a steady net debt of $50B, I have estimated the following values for market cap (EV+net debt) and thus share price (with 7.7B shares outstanding).<\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Enterprise Value<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Market cap<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Share Price<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Return<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">$1.778.9T<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">$1.828.9T<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">$237.5<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">59%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Figure 5:\u00a0<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">One obvious question here is whether the current EV\/EBIT of 23x is an overvaluation. Below are the share price and EV\/EBIT ratios for Microsoft and Apple.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">If Microsoft\u2019s EV\/EBIT catches up to its share price in a similar manner to Apple\u2019s, we can expect a multiple over 30x according to the graph, which can result in the following valuation in 2022:<\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Enterprise Value<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Market cap<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Share Price<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Return<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">$2.320T<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">$2.370T<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">$307.8<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">106%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By: Shayan Moazeni You are on a random walk down some street (let\u2019s say it\u2019s not Wall Street). You ask a random stranger for stock ideas. Off the top of their head, they will recite the FAANGs &#8212; large household companies like Amazon, Apple, and even Microsoft. At first sight, a stock that the Average <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/fall-2019\/microsoft-bandwagon-buy-or-calculated-investment\/\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"sr-only\">Read more about Microsoft: Bandwagon Buy, Or Calculated Investment?<\/span>[&hellip;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2119,"featured_media":226,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[13],"class_list":["post-223","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fall-2019","tag-shayan-moazeni"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2119"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=223"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":227,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/223\/revisions\/227"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/226"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/williamsinsight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}