![\"\"](\"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/f18-engl117-01\/files\/2017\/12\/lalaland-finalposter-cropped-300x141.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
I\u2019ll be honest: the first time I watched La La Land<\/em>, I didn\u2019t think about race at all. Not one bit. I was too engrossed in the plot of the film, in the conflict between ambition and love that drives the story. I was too distracted by the splendid patterns of colors dancing across the screen. I was too focused on the music and dancing for my mind to wander off and think about how Damian Chazelle chose to represent race and racial issues. I was so distracted from race that it seems Chazelle may have done it on purpose\u2014that he purposefully chose to have the viewer focus on things other than race, that he chose to leave to race out of the film. On the surface, La La Land<\/em> ignores issues of race\u2014not once are racial issues explicitly spoken of or brought up in any way. At a time when more and more films have racial issues at the forefront, Chazelle put racial issues in the backseat and shone a spotlight on other aspects of modern life.<\/p>\n Or did he?<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Due to historical notions of race, we often see race as an immutable trait each person possesses. I am white, for example, because I have (relatively) white skin. That I\u2019m white, we often think, is a fact rooted in biology\u2014rooted in my DNA. As Audrey and Brian Smedley argue, however, this is not the case. Race science, they claim, is bullshit. Rather than being biological, race is \u201c\u2026a folk idea, a culturally invented conception about human differences.\u201d (Smedley). Our conceptions of race, they argue, are based not on scientific notions of the biological difference between two races, but on cultural understandings of the differences between people who look different. If this is the case, then we must be learning about these racial distinctions from our culture. Films (and books, music, etc.) must teach us about how we should understand race and racial differences. So even though La La Land<\/em> appears to try so hard to ignore issues of race, maybe it is actually telling us something about those issues. Maybe its apparent ignorance is <\/em>the message it is trying to send. Maybe I didn\u2019t notice race in the film because it didn\u2019t want me to.<\/em><\/p>\n Upon closer examination of the film, there is one specific area where race should<\/em> play a significant role but doesn\u2019t: Ryan Gosling and John Legend\u2019s relationship with jazz as an art form. Gosling, a white man, wants to save jazz in its traditional form. \u201cIt\u2019s dying,\u201d he says, but \u201cnot on my watch.\u201d On the other end of the spectrum sits Legend, who wants to push jazz forward and mix it with other kinds of music. \u201cHow are you going to save jazz if no one is listening?\u201d he asks Gosling. \u201cJazz is dying because of people like you\u2026 You\u2019re holding on to the past, while jazz is about the future.\u201d What\u2019s bizarre about this dichotomy is that the white man wants to preserve jazz (and all of its black roots), while the black man wants to push it forward. Usually we would suspect it to be the other way around. Greg Tate, a prominent black writer, noted that whites \u201c\u2026have always tried to erase the Black presence from whatever Black thing They took a shine too,\u201d including jazz (Tate, 2-3). Usually, we would expect Gosling, not Legend, to want to push jazz forward (and thus erase the \u201cBlack presence\u201d from it). La La Land<\/em> flips the conventional racial script on its head\u2014the white man is playing the black man\u2019s role and vice versa. It undoes our usual racial conventions and produces an entirely new racial world as if to brag about how easy it was to do that.<\/p>\n While the battle between Gosling and Legend is the most prominent racial arena on the screen, race does appear in other parts of the film as well. The reason that we don\u2019t notice it (or at least that I didn\u2019t notice it) is because there is no racial struggle, no barrier to people of different races. In shot after shot after shot, we see whites, blacks, Latinos, Asians, and people of every other race coexisting in perfect harmony. Chazelle makes it apparent from the very beginning that different races can coexist\u2014the opening number features people from every race dancing together atop unmoving cars on an L.A. highway. Later on the racial mixing continues at the Hollywood parties and at the jazz clubs\u2014Chazelle even throws a mixed-race couple in for good measure (Gosling\u2019s white sister has a black fianc\u00e9). Chazelle is not oblivious to the reality of modern life and the de facto segregation that exists in it; he actively chooses to show a world in which it doesn\u2019t exist. Films can influence our perceptions of race, and Chazelle uses that to demonstrate to us that race really shouldn\u2019t matter. La La Land<\/em> removes (or flips, as in the case of Gosling and Legend) all of the usual racial barriers and differences, and I didn\u2019t even notice, because I was too distracted by the rest of the film. Racial expectations can be changed because they are cultural, not biological, and the film expects us and wants us to subconsciously realize that. When you don\u2019t think about race, as I didn\u2019t, you realize that it shouldn\u2019t matter.<\/p>\n https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=5MxwNeLoh8A<\/a><\/p>\n There is one scene in the film that stands out for its purposeful removal of race. As Gosling and his love interest Emma Stone dance in the stars of a planetarium, they fade into silhouettes. However, \u201cthe bodies spinning obviously don\u2019t belong to Gosling and Stone\u201d (Decker). We can see that their identities get erased when they start dancing. We don\u2019t know if they are black or white\u2014they are silhouettes. Moreover, to Chazelle it shouldn\u2019t matter what race they are, because race is just a cultural construct, one that can be undone, just as it was visually with two people fading into silhouettes on a screen. La La Land<\/em> chooses to show race as unimportant because it wants viewers to realize that it is <\/em>unimportant in the traditional sense. It doesn\u2019t matter what race you are, or what race I am. Race is a set of ideas that we have created and that we can destroy. The film wants us to do just that. It uses the fact that race is cultural\u2014the fact that our perceptions of race are shaped by culture\u2014to show us that race is cultural and can thus be changed.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Even though I didn\u2019t see race the first time I watched it, other (more attentive) viewers did. The #OscarsSoWhite campaign forced viewers to grapple with notions of race in a way they hadn\u2019t previously, and thus La La Land <\/em>received some attention for the seemingly small matters of race that did show up in the film. One common theme running through many of the criticisms can be summarized by the headline of the review in LA Weekly. <\/em>\u201cLa La Land<\/em> Is a Propaganda Film,\u201d the headline claims, because Chazelle completely ignored the dimensions of race he should have focused on; he showed a world where the problems of marginalized nonwhite people are negated and white people are given advantages they do not deserve. The film was \u201ca throwback to the 1950s without acknowledgment of how terrible the 1950s were for marginalized communities\u201d (Wolfe). The issue I take with this view is that it operates on the understanding that Chazelle is \u201cblind to the political power of film\u201d (Wolfe), and is thus almost accidentally producing this world. Film criticism, though, generally rests on the assumption that filmmakers do<\/em> know what they are doing\u2014the whole purpose of analyzing films is to determine what the filmmakers want us to glean from them. If we are going to give Chazelle the benefit of the doubt (as we habitually do to every filmmaker) and assume that he knew the power of film, this leads us to the conclusion that he was purposefully showing us that race shouldn\u2019t matter, because race is cultural. He\u2019s not blind to the problems of marginalized communities, nor is he living in a post-racial fantasy land\u2014he\u2019s using the power of film to show that it is possible for us to fix those problems and reach that post-racial fantasy land should we forget our cultural notions of race. The racial world in La La Land <\/em>is not a reflection of the real world, but a reflection of what Chazelle thinks the world can be.<\/p>\n All of this is not to say that La La Land <\/em>is not racially problematic. It is.<\/p>\n Even though race shouldn\u2019t matter, it still does, and it will for the foreseeable future. Audrey and Brian Smedley, the same writers who argued that race is cultural, still think it is important to address it: \u201calthough the term race<\/em> is not useful as a biological construct, policymakers cannot avoid the fact that social race remains a significant predictor of which groups have greater access to societal goods and resources and which groups face barriers\u2014both historically and in the contemporary context\u2014to full inclusion.\u201d (Smedley & Smedley). La La Land<\/em> makes the mistake of assuming that just because race is cultural it doesn\u2019t<\/em> matter. It equates shouldn\u2019t (as in race shouldn\u2019t<\/em> matter) with doesn\u2019t (as in race doesn\u2019t<\/em> matter). Race is cultural and<\/em> it does still matter, because we have assumed that it matters for so long that we have put roadblocks into society for nonwhite people. We can\u2019t just forget our cultural notions of race to make racial divisions go away\u2014it\u2019s too late for that.<\/p>\n I\u2019ll be honest again: I really enjoyed La La Land <\/em>the first time I saw it, and I still do, even given its problematic racial conclusions. Just because films influence our racial understandings in a negative way does not mean they are inherently bad films. I can like La La Land<\/em> and still comprehend that it has problems. If you liked La La Land <\/em>too, that\u2019s fine\u2014you just need to be cognizant of how it is trying to get you to think about race and aware of whether you want to agree with it or not. You need to think this way with all films, because whether you realize it or not, they are influencing your perceptions of race, and those perceptions matter.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n An earlier draft of this essay was read by Keith Penney.<\/p>\n I have written this essay in the style of Chuck Klosterman.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Works Cited<\/p>\n Decker, Todd. “Musical Fakery in ‘La La Land’: Ryan Gosling, Fred Astaire and Why Performance Still Matters.” The Center for the Humanities<\/em>, Washington University in St. Louis, 21 Feb. 2017, cenhum.artsci.wustl.edu\/features\/Todd-Decker-Musical-Fakery-in-La-La-Land?_ga=2.18308209.957857553.1512949887-1313715953.1512949887. Accessed 11 Dec. 2017.<\/p>\n La La Land<\/em>. Directed by Damien Chapelle, Summit Entertainment, 2016.<\/p>\n Smedley, Audrey, and Brian D. Smelly. “Race as Biology Is Fiction, Racism as a Social Problem Is Real: Anthropological and Historical Perspectives on the Social Construction of Race.” American Psychologist<\/em>, vol. 60, no. 1, Jan. 2005. APA PsycNET<\/em>. Accessed 11 Dec. 2017.<\/p>\n Tate, Greg, editor. Everything But the Burden: What White People Are Taking from Black Culture<\/em>. Broadway Books, 2003.<\/p>\n Wolfe, April. “La La Land Is a Propaganda Film.” LA Weekly<\/em> [Los Angeles], 23 Feb. 2017, www.laweekly.com\/film\/la-la-land-is-a-propaganda-film-7963834. Accessed 11 Dec. 2017.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I\u2019ll be honest: the first time I watched La La Land, I didn\u2019t think about race at all. Not one bit. I was too engrossed in the plot of the film, in the conflict between ambition and love that drives the story. I was too distracted by the splendid patterns of colors dancing across … Continue reading (The Lack of) Race in La La Land<\/span> ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/f18-engl117-01\/files\/2017\/12\/john-legend-la-la-land-2017-billboard-1548-300x198.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/f18-engl117-01\/files\/2017\/12\/fc8a4e17b0dae0e93da6f5900a8a8dec-300x169.jpg\")
<\/p>\n