{"id":1423,"date":"2023-05-17T13:08:12","date_gmt":"2023-05-17T17:08:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/?p=1423"},"modified":"2023-05-17T13:08:12","modified_gmt":"2023-05-17T17:08:12","slug":"states-near-historic-deal-to-protect-colorado-river","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/education\/states-near-historic-deal-to-protect-colorado-river\/","title":{"rendered":"States near historic deal to protect Colorado River"},"content":{"rendered":"

After nearly a year wrestling over the fate of their water supply, California, Arizona and Nevada \u2014 the three key states in the Colorado River\u2019s current crisis<\/a> \u2014 have coalesced around a plan to voluntarily conserve a major portion of their river water <\/b>in exchange for more than $1 billion in federal funds, according to people familiar with the negotiations.<\/p>\n

\n

The consensus emerging among these states and the Biden administration aims to conserve <\/b>about 13 percent of their allocation of river water over the next three years and protect the nation\u2019s largest reservoirs, which provide drinking water<\/a> and hydropower for tens of millions of people.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

But thorny issues remain that could complicate a deal. The parties are trying to work through them before a key deadline at the end of the month, according to several current and former state and federal officials familiar with the situation.<\/p>\n

\n

Participants <\/b>are discussing cutting back about 3 million acre-feet of water over the next three years, the majority of it paid for with federal money approved in the Inflation Reduction Act.<\/a> But the parties are still negotiating how much of those water savings will go uncompensated. In meetings over the last month, <\/b>representatives for the three states, which form the river\u2019s Lower Basin, <\/b>have also raised doubts about the federal government\u2019s environmental review process that is now underway to formally revise the rules that govern operations at Lake Powell and Lake Mead.<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

State officials have suggested they could make a deal on their own and are resisting a May 30 deadline to comment on the alternatives the federal government has laid out in that process, according to people familiar with the talks. The review process is intended to define Interior Secretary Deb Haaland\u2019s authority to make emergency cuts in states\u2019 water use, even if those cuts contradict existing water rights.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

These developments represent a new phase <\/b>in the long-running <\/b>talks about the future of the river. For much of the past year, negotiations have pitted California against Arizona<\/a>, as they are the states who suck the most from Lake Mead and will have to bear the greatest burden of the historic cuts that the Biden administration has been calling for to protect the river. But these states now appear more united than ever and are closing their differences with the federal government, even as significant issues remain unresolved.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The Interior Department declined to comment on the status of the private negotiations. The Colorado River commissioners from Arizona, California and Nevada also declined to comment.<\/p>\n

Read more from Joshua Partlow<\/a><\/span><\/span> of The Washington Post<\/em>:\u00a0 https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/climate-environment\/2023\/05\/17\/water-rights-colorado-river-near-deal\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

After nearly a year wrestling over the fate of their water supply, California, Arizona and Nevada \u2014 the three key states in the Colorado River\u2019s current crisis \u2014 have coalesced around a plan to voluntarily conserve a major portion of their river water in exchange for more than $1 billion in federal funds, according to…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1865,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1423","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1865"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1423"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1423\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1424,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1423\/revisions\/1424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}