{"id":1381,"date":"2023-04-19T09:36:26","date_gmt":"2023-04-19T13:36:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/?p=1381"},"modified":"2023-04-19T09:36:42","modified_gmt":"2023-04-19T13:36:42","slug":"farmers-impacted-by-colorado-river-cuts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/education\/farmers-impacted-by-colorado-river-cuts\/","title":{"rendered":"Farmers Impacted by Colorado River Water Cuts"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

BRAWLEY, Calif. \u2014 Alex Jack has spared little expense in the quest to grow vegetables in the desert with less water.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

It has cost him $2.5 million over the years to be on the cutting edge of efficiency, installing underground irrigation under alfalfa and lettuce beds, building aerated reservoirs and a network of pipes and pumps to recycle runoff. But his 3,500-acre farm still guzzles more of the Colorado River<\/a> each year than some midsize cities.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Now, as the Biden administration moves closer to imposing unprecedented cuts<\/a> in how much water states can pull from the river, Jack and other commercial farmers in the sun-scorched flatlands of the Imperial Valley are in the crosshairs of those reductions.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The Imperial Valley \u2014 a wedge of desert farmland in Southern California on the Mexican border \u2014 uses more of the Colorado River than the states of Utah, Wyoming, Nevada and New Mexico combined. To its critics outside California, it is a logical place to cut: The roughly 400 farms<\/a> served by the Imperial Irrigation District consume the single largest share of a river that is needed by 40 million people. Some of their major crops, such as alfalfa, require lavish amounts of water and are sold for animal feed, including outside the United States.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

And yet, these farmers also have some of the oldest legal rights to that water, dating back more than a century to a time before the creation of the Bureau of Reclamation, the federal agency that now oversees how the river is divvied up. And their fields drive a $4 billion industry<\/a> that employs tens of thousands of people and puts vegetables in supermarkets across the country during the winter.<\/p>\n

\n

That dynamic has put farmers such as Jack in a powerful, yet precarious, position. There is an ongoing dispute<\/a> <\/b>between California and other states of the Colorado River basin about who must bear the brunt of any future reductions. <\/b>The Interior Department proposed three options for cuts this week, including one that strictly follows water rights, giving priority to the Imperial Valley\u2019s farmers \u2014 and potentially letting the portion of the river that goes to <\/b>Los Angeles and Phoenix draw down to virtually nothing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Many river experts consider that politically untenable.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cIs the [Imperial Irrigation District] really going to be allowed to grow alfalfa hay and export it while 10 million people in Los Angeles go without?\u201d said Ted Cooke, who recently retired as the general manager of the Central Arizona Project, which distributes the Colorado River in that state.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cOf course not.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

As the negotiations between the states<\/a> continue in a bid to prevent the federal government from making unilateral cuts this summer, some farmers are seeking to buy new land to secure rights to more water. Jack and other farmers have met with Reclamation commissioner Camille Calimlim Touton and wrestled with how much they should be paid to voluntarily give up a portion of their supply.<\/p>\n

\n

The more than $4 billion Reclamation has to spend from the Inflation Reduction Act<\/a> on drought resilience is attracting a lot of interest among California farmers. But the Imperial Irrigation District has not yet reached an agreement with the federal government on compensation for cuts. Farmers here say the amounts they\u2019ve heard discussed do not seem enough to pay for more efficient irrigation practices that could save water long-term. The only option, they say, may be to leave ground fallow. That practice ripples through the economy as workers lose jobs, suppliers lose business and produce prices rise.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cFallowing destroys our ag economy,\u201d said Alex Cardenas, president of the Imperial Irrigation District board of directors. \u201cThere are alternatives to fallowing. But there\u2019s significant investment that needs to be made.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Jack and other farmers in the Imperial Valley say they are willing to negotiate fair compensation but are also ready to defend the lifeblood of their community.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u201cWe have water rights. And we will stand on our water rights,\u201d he added. \u201cIf you\u2019re going to fight us, it\u2019s like fighting a warthog. We\u2019ll get in deep and watch our territory.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read more from Joshua Partlow<\/a><\/span><\/span> of The Washington Post<\/em>:\u00a0 https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/climate-environment\/2023\/04\/16\/colorado-river-crisis-imperial-valley-california\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

BRAWLEY, Calif. \u2014 Alex Jack has spared little expense in the quest to grow vegetables in the desert with less water. It has cost him $2.5 million over the years to be on the cutting edge of efficiency, installing underground irrigation under alfalfa and lettuce beds, building aerated reservoirs and a network of pipes and…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1865,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-education"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1865"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1381"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1381\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1383,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1381\/revisions\/1383"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sites.williams.edu\/environmental-justice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}