There is no “best” or “right” way to handle past injustices in a fledgling democracy. On the one hand, people, everyday citizens, committed heinous atrocities to other citizens. On the other, removing these people, who often hold positions of power, could result in the collapse of the a new, unstable democracy.
With this tradeoff in mind, I think it should be clear that removing said individuals immediately after the new democracy is formed is not the optimal strategy. Doing so would have a higher likelihood of bringing down that new democracy than waiting. Unfortunately, this leaves many citizens unsatisfied. However, it must be made clear to them that they would be considerably worse off in a failed state (again).
Instead, countries should, in the short term, make a concerted effort to publicize and remember their past atrocities. They cannot be protected and kept from the public – a strong state brandishes their past failures so that they are part of a history, a history to never be repeated. This can be done through memorial days centered around these injustices and direct compensation to affected families of such injustices.
Although it is not clear when this point would be or, frankly, how to recognize it, once the new state is strong enough, then remaining public figures that were part of the past atrocities should be removed. No life time positions (a la Pinochet) should ever be granted. Once removed, higher up individuals, not the “foot soldiers” following orders, should be prosecuted and punished. By doing this, more citizens can feel indirect catharsis and fewer people from the past regime, now part of the new society, can continue living.
認めなければならないことは、あなたが所有する認定資格がますます増えていることです。 これが、CWDP-304認定を取得することの重要性を認識する必要がある理由です。 私たちの将来の雇用のためのより資格のある認定は、彼らの能力を証明するのに十分な資格認定を持っているだけで、社会的競争でライバルに勝つことができると見なされる効果があります。 したがって、CWDP-304ガイド急流は、ユーザーがより速く、より効率的に参加するために必要な資格のあるCWDP-304試験に合格するのに役立ちます。
I’m deeply impressed by your article, thank you for sharing it! The Real 1Z0-1194-24 braindumps exam questions are now available for free. Good luck to everyone!
Thank you for the article; it was incredibly impressive and thought-provoking. Using the D-PE-FN-23 sample questions pdf, I got promoted and received a salary raise. Now it’s open to all for free. Hope you all move up in your careers soon!
Nun ist die Microsoft DP-900 Zertifizierungsprüfung eine beliebte Prüfung in der IT-Branche. Viele IT-Fachleute wollen das Microsoft DP-900 Zertfikat erhalten. So ist die Microsoft DP-900 Zertifizierungsprüfung eine beliebte Prüfung. Das Microsoft DP-900 Zertfikat ist sehr hilfreich, um Ihre Arbeit in der IT-Industrie zu verbessern und Ihr Gehalt zu erhöhen und Ihrem Leben eine zuverlässige Garantie zu geben.
That piece was both thought-provoking and enriching. Sharpen your IT knowledge with free MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I reliable exam camp free. Wishing you success!
Tech4Exam必要な内容を収集してCompTIA分析し、CAS-004-JPNトレーニングクイズに記入することで、試験受験者の98％以上が楽かつ効率的に試験に合格しました。 CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner (CASP+) Exam (CAS-004日本語版)試験に関連する学習したいすべてのメッセージは、CAS-004-JPN練習エンジンで見つけることができます。 CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner (CASP+) Exam (CAS-004日本語版)環境で行われた変更および次の試験での予測は、それらによって以前にコンパイルされます。
I think you raise a very valid point when discussing the challenge in balancing the moral and the practical. While dissatisfaction among citizens is never optimal, I think your mentioning of perspective is critical, because I do feel that many citizens do not realize what would be at risk if action was taken against ousted authoritarian officials in the short term. To me, I see morality becoming more prominent in the long term, as it allows for democracy to cement itself within society, creating political stability and lowering the risk of sliding back into authoritarian ways. I completely agree that states and citizens should make efforts in the short term to remember past atrocities, but it is interesting to think about whether this comes with any risk itself, for often they are polarizing issues among citizens and can create instability.
I think you raise a very valid point when discussing the challenge in balancing the moral and the practical. While dissatisfaction among citizens is never optimal, I think your mentioning of perspective is critical, because I do feel that many citizens do not realize what would be at risk if action was taken against ousted authoritarian officials in the short term. To me, I see morality becoming more prominent in the long term, as it allows for democracy to cement itself within society, creating political stability and lowering the risk of sliding back into authoritarian ways. I completely agree that states and citizens should make efforts in the short term to remember past atrocities, but it is interesting to think about whether this comes with any risk itself, for often they are polarizing issues among citizens and can create instability.