Broken Hearts: A Result of Faulty Methodology

I find Masha Gessen’s claim in “The Dying Russians” that broken hearts were the cause of dying in Russia provocative but not scientific and therefore ultimately not compelling. Her story about her time in Russia which she begins the piece with is captivating. It probably does capture certain aspects of the problems that effect Russia. However, it is just anecdotal. Gessen is unable to recognize or chooses not to acknowledge the limitations of anecdotal evidence and that is ultimately the reason why her argument fails. She chooses to fit the data to reflect her initial explanation of her experience rather than be open to amending or changing her explanation entirely. This is an example of the “method-driven” political science that Shapiro talks about. Her methodology is also very flawed.  She focuses on “[ticking] off a list of culprits” instead of proving her own claim. She argues that if it’s not infectious disease, not diet, not the environment, not alcohol, not a typical cause then it must be a broken heart. Eliminating other popular explanations is never enough evidence itself to prove your claim. She needed to provide evidence for her explanation, and she does not do so, nor does she provide a framework for studying what she means by “broken hearts” (i.e. tangible indicators). Broken hearts are also less causal factors of death then correlated symptoms of the same problem. It is as much the cause of death as per capita cheese consumption is the cause of people who die by becoming tangled in their bedsheets.

28 thoughts on “Broken Hearts: A Result of Faulty Methodology

  1. I was completely taken by that article. Thanks to the AI1-C01 test prep, I was able to earn a promotion and raise. It’s now free to all. Wishing you all the best for your promotion!

  2. Die SAP C_THR95_2405 Zertifizierungsprüfung ist eine wichtige SAP Zertifizierungsprüfung. Aber es ist nicht einfach, die SAP C_THR95_2405 Zertifizierungsprüfung zu bestehen. Um den Druck der Kandidaten zu entlasten und Zeit und Energie zu ersparen hat Fast2test viele Prüfungsmaterialien entwickelt. So können Sie im Fast2test die geeignete und effziente Trainingsmethode wählen, um die C_THR95_2405 Prüfung zu bestehen.

  3. 通過Salesforce Advanced-Cross-Channel 認證考試的方法有很多種,花大量時間和精力來復習Salesforce Advanced-Cross-Channel 認證考試相關的專業知識是一種方法,通過少量時間和金錢選擇使用PDFExamDumps的針對性訓練和練習題也是一種方法。

  4. The article opened my eyes to so many new ideas. Here’s the Certified C_C4H62_2408 questions test that helped me secure my promotion and salary raise. It’s free today for all. Good luck in your career growth!

  5. CompTIA CS0-003인증시험패스에는 많은 방법이 있습니다. 먼저 많은 시간을 투자하고 신경을 써서 전문적으로 과련 지식을 터득한다거나; 아니면 적은 시간투자와 적은 돈을 들여 Fast2test의 인증시험덤프를 구매하는 방법 등이 있습니다.

  6. It offered a wealth of insights I hadn’t considered before. Thanks to the 1Y0-341 reliable exam notes, I got promoted and received a salary raise. Now, I’m offering it for free. Wishing you all success in your careers!

  7. This article is wonderfully written, and I’ve learned many useful techniques from it. Here’s the free Reliable C-LIXEA-2404 practice questions download material! Wishing everyone good luck on their exams!

  8. 많은 분들이 고난의도인 ISACA관련인증시험을 응시하고 싶어 하는데 이런 시험은 많은 전문적인 관련지식이 필요합니다. 시험은 당연히 완전히 전문적인 COBIT-Design-and-Implementation관련지식을 터득하자만이 패스할 가능성이 높습니다. 하지만 지금은 많은 방법들로 여러분의 부족한 면을 보충해드릴 수 있으며 또 힘든 ISACA시험도 패스하실 수 있습니다. 혹은 여러분은 전문적인 ISACA COBIT Design and Implementation Certificate관련지식을 터득하자들보다 더 간단히 더 빨리 시험을 패스하실 수 있습니다.

  9. Wir sind der Schnellste, der daa IIBA ECBA Zertifikat erhält; wir sind noch der höchste, der Ihre Interessen schützt. Wir sind PrüfungFrage. PrüfungFrage kann Ihnen versprechen, dass die Testaufgaben von IIBA ECBA Zertifizierungsprüfung 100% richtig und ganz umfassend sind. Nachdem Sie die Testfragen zur IIBA ECBA Zertifizierung gekauft haben, werden Sie kostenlos die einjährige Aktualisierung genießen.

  10. I’m amazed by this article, thank you for sharing it. I owe my promotion and raise to the Reasonable CRISC exam price questions, and today I’m sharing them for free with all of you!

  11. Your article is a work of art, thank you for sharing it with us! Get the 5V0-31.23 valid test dumps test that contributed to my promotion and salary raise, available for free today. Best wishes for your career!

  12. I agree with your reaction to her work, particularly when you are talking about Gessen “ticking off” different reasons that aren’t causing death, but not supporting her own claim. In this way, her work gives the appearance of being somewhat scientific, and yet when you look closer you realize that all of this just leads up to her grand hypothesis that none of her statistical evidence explains. Just because you can rule out some potential causes, that does not mean that the only correct answer left is your own. I also think, in this case, the emphasis should have been geared more towards cultural analysis and less towards the empirical, rational method of study. Overall, her piece should have focused on exploring any evidence she had to support her argument rather than looking trying to rule out all of the other hypotheses which, given the multitude of things that could be killing Russians, seems rather impossible to do, especially in just seven pages.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.