Journalism Masking as Science

The claim that a group of people are “dying of broken hearts” is a challenge to fathom, let alone empirically prove. However, Masha Gessen tries to do so for the reader by using the language of scientific and cultural reasoning, though her conclusion becomes more like sensationalist journalism. She begins her piece on what appears to be a strong, ethnographic footing as she briefly describes her research, presents anecdotal evidence, and goes on to cite Michelle Parson’s anthropological work Dying Unneeded to discuss the merits and the limitations of it. These are two promising steps in her search for the “answer” to her opening quandary about high Russian mortality rates, since both focus on a kind of thick description, and particularly in the case of Parson’s work, a Geertzian method of deeply embedding oneself in the culture in question.

In my opinion, Gessen starts to stray when she switches to a strong reliance on statistical evidence which she uses to rule out causes like drinking, smoking, environmental issues, and economic upheavals as the cause of death. However, she lacks any empirical data supporting her “broken heart” theory. She concludes her piece by abandon the cultural and rational methods of study she attempted to employ earlier and delves head first into sensationalist journalism when she presents this unsubstantiated, broad-base claim that the reason that all Russians are dying so young and so frequently is attributable solely to “broken hearts.”

This piece lacks the plethora of evidence needed to convince any reader that the root cause is broken hearts. For a claim such as this, a cultural approach with support from rational-choice methodology, as Gessen started to present, seems best to study the problem at hand. However, unlike Gessen’s, the work should richer, more nuanced, and focus in on the people, similar to how Gressen describes Parson’s work.

21 thoughts on “Journalism Masking as Science

  1. Loved it immediately, clicking that like. The CORe reliable exam guide helped me earn a promotion and salary increase. I’m now sharing it for free with everyone. Wishing you all success in your careers!

  2. VCESoft的FCP_FGT_AD-7.4資料不僅能讓你通過考試,還可以讓你學到關於FCP_FGT_AD-7.4考試的很多知識。VCESoft的考古題把你應該要掌握的技能全都包含在試題中,這樣你就可以很好地提高自己的能力,並且在工作中更好地應用它們。VCESoft的FCP_FGT_AD-7.4考古題絕對是你準備考試並提高自己技能的最好的選擇。你要相信VCESoft可以給你一個美好的未來。

  3. I’m deeply thankful for your article, it left a lasting effect. I got a promotion and raise with the help of the NSK200 latest test practice. Now, I’m offering it for free. Wishing you all success in your career growth!

  4. No hesitation, just hitting like for this great content. This Reliable exam QREP questions and answers helped me get promoted and receive a salary increase. Now, it’s free for everyone. Wishing you success in your career journey!

  5. That was a truly transformative read. Thanks to the 2V0-31.24 latest test camp file, I received a promotion and salary increase. It’s free now for everyone. Wishing you all success in your careers!

  6. Pass4Test는Fortinet NSE7_EFW-7.2시험을 패스할 수 있는 아주 좋은 사이트입니다. Pass4Test은 아주 알맞게 최고의Fortinet NSE7_EFW-7.2시험문제와 답 내용을 만들어 냅니다. 덤프는 기존의 시험문제와 답과 시험문제분석 등입니다. Pass4Test에서 제공하는Fortinet NSE7_EFW-7.2시험자료의 문제와 답은 실제시험의 문제와 답과 아주 비슷합니다.

  7. Aufgrund der großen Übereinstimmung mit den echten Prüfungsfragen- und Antworten können wir Ihnen 100%-Pass-Garantie versprechen. Wir aktualisieren jeden Tag nach den Informationen von Prüfungsabsolventen oder Mitarbeiter von Testcentern. unsere Prüfungsfragen und Antworten zu Huawei H13-624_V5.5 (HCIP-Storage V5.5). Wir extrahieren jeden Tag die Informationen der tatsächlichen Prüfungen und integrieren in unsere Produkte integrieren.

  8. I disagree that Parson’s work is useful in providing a “strong footing” to analyze Russia’s high mortality rate. Parson does attempt to engage in thick description, but Geertz’s style of analysis would necessitate examining the significance of a culture at the time in question. Parson’s retrospective interviewees are temporally separate from the events they are discussing, and their thoughts and feelings likely would have changed in the more than ten years elapsed, especially because that time period in Russia encompassed so much cultural change. Gessen even recognizes this weakness herself, noting that the subjects’ “memories have been transformed by the intervening years of social and economic upheaval.” The statistical evidence, in my opinion, is much more convincing than Parson’s anecdotal evidence. It’s interesting, for example, that the Russian fertility rate is 1.61, and that Russia’s mortality levels from CVD are 30% higher than all deaths in Western Europe. Although I agree that Gessen does not use it convincingly, she does have some empirical evidence which is more useful than retrospective interviews in examining a quantitative issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.