In the documentary “Please Vote for Me,” we observe how even with participation from “citizens,” democracy is still extremely susceptible to failure. The elections in this classroom have no real consequences, resulting in the kids engaging in acts of bribery, ridicule, and other hostile behavior, seen almost constantly throughout the film. Xioafei, for example, is the target of horrible insults before she even is allowed to perform her flute solo, serving as a clear example of how democracy can easily decline into a battle to undermine and discredit one’s opponent.
While most watching this would instantly recognized how flawed their class election is, what is shown in “Please Vote for Me” is eerily similar to American democracy. Candidates for a plethora of elected positions constantly resort to attempting to politically ruin their opponent by foul play and other dishonest means, resulting in a system that is brutal and ugly. This nearly defeats the purpose of democracy as an entirety, as candidates’ methods in seeking election invalidate the sophisticated and elegant system that democracy is designed to enable. At the end, the students vote for Luo Lei, the obvious worst choice for class monitor as he is authoritarian and often resorts to physical violence against his fellow students, further emphasizing how even with participation in a democratic election, oftentimes bribes and falsehoods result in an unfit candidate rising to power.
Your article was so impactful, I’m sincerely thankful for it. Time to tackle the IdentityNow-Engineer test score report exam! Fingers crossed!
GIAC GMLE 덤프는 pdf버전,테스트엔진버전, 온라인버전 세가지 버전의 파일로 되어있습니다. pdf버전은 반드시 구매하셔야 하고 테스트엔진버전과 온라인버전은 pdf버전 구매시 추가구매만 가능합니다. pdf버전은 인쇄가능하기에 출퇴근길에서도 공부가능하고 테스트엔진버전은 pc에서 작동가능한 프로그램이고 온라인버전은 pc외에 휴태폰에서도 작동가능합니다.
What an outstanding piece of writing, I’m truly impressed! Free Valid braindumps NSE5_FAZ-7.2 free exam questions now available. Wishing you all success!
Sorgen Sie noch um die Prüfungsunterlagen der SAP C-THR86-2405? Jetzt brauchen Sie keine Sorgen! Weil uns zu finden bedeutet, dass Sie schon die Schlüssel zur Prüfungszertifizierung der SAP C-THR86-2405 gefunden haben. Wir ZertSoft beschäftigen uns seit Jahren mit der Entwicklung der Software der IT-Zertifizierungsprüfung. Jetzt genießen wir einen guten Ruf weltweit. Wir bieten Ihnen die effektivsten Hilfe bei der Vorbereitung der SAP C-THR86-2405.
この不安の時代には、誰もが大きなプレッシャーを感じているようです。あなたがより良いなら、あなたはよりリラックスした生活を送るでしょう。 AD0-E908ガイド資料を使用すると、作業の効率を高めることができます。他のことにもっと時間をかけることができます。教材を使用すると、最短時間でAD0-E908試験に合格できます。あなたは他の人よりも高い出発点に立っています。なぜAD0-E908の練習問題が選択に値するのですか？ AD0-E908試験問題のデモを無料でダウンロードして、AD0-E908学習教材の利点をご理解いただければ幸いです。
I agree with your claim that the class elections having “no real consequences” deeply effected the democratic process and outcome. Since there was no real consequence to electing anyone I believe that the election was determined by feeling and not objective policy or perceived outcome. I do not believe that Luo Lei won because of his use of force but of the view that nothing was going to change anyway so why should we elect someone different. Also I believe the distributing of goodies before the election gave voters a sense of comfort with the current official adding something that could change into the picture “not getting gifts” which made it easier for the class to want to preserve the current situation
I definitely agree that the system is brutal and ugly. However, I am not sure that the film portrays an example of a failed democracy. I think it could be argued that the democracy worked exactly as intended and that all the unfortunate results were simply symptoms of a functional democracy. Luo Lei won because he had access to resources that his opponents did not. This is definitely unfortunate, but I think it’s an inevitable result of campaigning in a democracy, particularly in an American democracy.