From this parable, one of the most interesting things to consider is the dynamic between power and attitude. As everyone has previously said, this story is an example of a small desolate town being altered by modern industrialization and capitalism. However, what I find even more significant than this transformation is the complacency of the Chief versus the yearning for change in the Grocer. The Chief maintained his position of power in both accounts of Balgat, and both interviewers seemed to portray the Chief as someone satisfied with living in Balgat, regardless of what it looked like. In contrast to this, the Grocer wanted nothing more then “to get out of his hole” (Lerner, 49). Power creates contentment, and being stripped of power creates longing. I also find it very interesting that hope and America are always connected for people living outside of its context. It seems that more often than not people who lack power in their own society long to come to America and make something of themselves: “I have heard that its is a nice country, and with possibilities to be rich even for the simplest person” (Lerner). I have to wonder if this outsider view of America still persists today, or if it is better understood that America is a place with low social mobility, and little chance to gain power if you don’t already have it.
I want to believe that the Chief was not against progress, but change that is rooted in Western understanding. Progress is inevitable, and happens everywhere; but the kind of change that belittles your values is what the Chief was against. The grocer’s progression might be in passing glory in the long-run. Its remifications might not have solutions
I like the analysis of the attitudes of the Chief and the Grocer. Their attitudes bring irony to the story. The Grocer, the dreamer, winds up dead within four years, and the Chief, the stronghold, loses power. Ironically, both men regress while Balgat progresses. Modernization brings about rapid change with no regard to individual attitudes.
Kami,
I agree about the differing attitudes of both the Grocer and the Chief. The Chief was completely content in his world and thus preached values that would keep the community static and unchanging. On the other hand, the Grocer was centered around expansive fantasies and in turn aided in the mobilization and modernization of Balgat.