While I agree with Gatto’s general argument and recognize the deep structural flaws within our current public school system, particularly in its function as a determinant of position/success within the social hierarchy (36-37), my main issue with Gatto’s writing is his demonization of conformity and his proposition that autonomy is the best alternative to our current system. Gatto references conformity as a way for government to control the masses, to make people “as alike as possible” and “predictable” (36), and while it is certainly possible for conformity to be used this way, I do not think that conformity should be seen the enemy. After all, isn’t some level of conformity necessary for a complex society—especially one as large as we have today in America—to function?
At the end of his article, Gatto leaves us with the idea that we should simply “let [educated men and women] manage themselves” (38). This statement raises a couple of questions in my mind: to what extent should these educated men and women be allowed to manage themselves? Is it possible for a society in which everyone is completely self-governing to survive? In general, I do not think that it is possible.
– Emily Peckham
I think you raise a valid point Emily. At what point do we have to sacrifice individual freedom and happiness for the greater cause/functionality of a country? I feel that this question needs to be examined in the creation of any public school system. A balance of the right amount of personal responsibility, but also consistent discipline for students needs to be reached. Without some sort of predictable and standardized doctrine it would become extremely difficult for an individual to navigate the ins and outs of their society.
I completely agree with your thoughts on conformity, Emily, specifically regarding Gatto’s criticisms of it. Gatto seems to have a very grim understanding of conformity, claiming that schools are akin to factories that are creating robots, with no ability to think for themselves or separate themselves from the crowd. I like your point that a certain level of conformity is necessary for a society as complex as our’s. While there should be some room for people to express themselves and their individuality, a society comprised entirely of individuals with different ideas and different goals simply would not function, whereas a society of people who are able to be an individual, yet also somewhat conform to society in order to work towards a common goal can thrive.