Over the past ten years democracy’s legitimacy has been questioned in America countless times. The country is more divided as ever, and many things that were once considered “status quo” are being overthrown. It seems that the United States is reaching a crescendo of mayhem, and it’s only about time until the rules and norms of democracy “as we know it” snap. As a country, we are in political uproar and confusion. The past two presidents, President Obama and President Trump have enlightened many of us to the deeply rooted problems in our governing system. President Obama’s terms have uncovered how easy it is to gridlock, while so far President Trump threatens our liberal democratic culture, forcing us be disillusioned with democracy.
However, it is not democracy that is endangered. What is troubling most of us, is a shift from liberal democracy to illiberal democracy. As highlighted in article, “Fareed Zakaria made a scary prediction about democracy in 1997- and it’s coming true” by Sean Illing, democracy and liberalism are not synonymous with each other. Many confuse liberalism with democracy.
Trendufeed is a content platform dedicated to delivering the latest trending news, updates, and viral stories. It consolidates information from various fields, making it accessible and convenient for users who want to stay informed. Health and Wellness Tips
Baddiehubtimes is a platform that offers an exclusive collection of curated content, including photos, videos, and articles tailored to individuals interested in lifestyle, beauty, and social trends. baddiehub
It’s certainly true, that, in the 2016 election, the “population’s preferences do not represent the outcome.” Hillary Clinton won the popular vote yet didn’t get elected, but that outcome doesn’t derive from a disillusionment with liberal democracy. Rather, it is rooted in systemic issues that have existed in this country since it’s inception. I, too, agree that Trump shouldn’t be in office because he doesn’t accurately represent us, but that’s not to say that he didn’t deserve to win. He’s just exposing the problems with our electoral system. His election doesn’t represent a new shift towards illiberal democracy; the illiberal nature of the electoral system that allowed for his victory has been there all along.
Sydney, I particularly like your last paragraph. I think the root of the problem is in culture. A self-interested society isn’t interested in building groups to account for society’s popular passions. We defer to the right or the left.