While I agree with Gatto’s general argument and recognize the deep structural flaws within our current public school system, particularly in its function as a determinant of position/success within the social hierarchy (36-37), my main issue with Gatto’s writing is his demonization of conformity and his proposition that autonomy is the best alternative to our current system. Gatto references conformity as a way for government to control the masses, to make people “as alike as possible” and “predictable” (36), and while it is certainly possible for conformity to be used this way, I do not think that conformity should be seen the enemy. After all, isn’t some level of conformity necessary for a complex society—especially one as large as we have today in America—to function?
At the end of his article, Gatto leaves us with the idea that we should simply “let [educated men and women] manage themselves” (38). This statement raises a couple of questions in my mind: to what extent should these educated men and women be allowed to manage themselves? Is it possible for a society in which everyone is completely self-governing to survive? In general, I do not think that it is possible.
– Emily Peckham