In this documentary, democracy is viewed as something that can be taken for granted. Under the authoritarian state that the kids live in, they are unable to voice their opinions. Due to his incumbency, Lluo Lei, a strict and unforgiving leader, maintains an authoritarian state that the citizens tolerate more than they would from anyone else. The power of incumbency was shocking. Despite the harsh rule, Luo Lei still remained the class monitor even though his power and position were not taken in the right perspective. From reading the Prince and discussing Machievelli’s point of view on government, it is clear to see that Xiaofei failed as a leader. Xiaofei would rather be loved than feared and in Machiavelli’s eyes this was a fatal flaw.
Introduction to Comparative Politics: Nationalism, Ideology, and State Power
Professor Shervin Malekzadeh
Hello! I had a unique assignment to explore leadership during crisis situations, focusing on the Chilean mine rescue. I discovered an essay at nursing paper that provided an in-depth analysis of the leadership styles and strategies employed during the rescue. This essay not only enhanced my understanding of crisis leadership but also helped me articulate the critical decisions that led to the successful outcome.
I’m not sure that I wholly agree with the classroom being categorized as an authoritarian state. A key trait of democracy is participating in politics. Since Luo Lei was elected based off a majority from the participation of his classmates voting, can’t we consider that democracy? I do agree, however, that Luo Lei’s politics embody a bit of an authoritarian state. My question remains, where do we mark that transition from democracy to authoritarianism?